Product comparison · 2 modems

Conceptronic 56kbps USB voice/fax/modem vs TP-Link TD-8817 modem

8specifications compared
6differ
2identical
22known for one product only

Key differences

The Conceptronic 56kbps USB voice/fax/modem has 92 mm more depth than the TP-Link TD-8817 modem (200 mm vs 108 mm). The TP-Link TD-8817 modem has 8 mm more height than the Conceptronic 56kbps USB voice/fax/modem (28 mm vs 20 mm). The TP-Link TD-8817 modem has 145 mm more width than the Conceptronic 56kbps USB voice/fax/modem (165 mm vs 20 mm). Interface: USB 2.0 on the Conceptronic 56kbps USB voice/fax/modem, USB 2.0/Ethernet Port on the TP-Link TD-8817 modem. Cables included: Phone (RJ-11) on the Conceptronic 56kbps USB voice/fax/modem, LAN (RJ-45), Phone (RJ-11) on the TP-Link TD-8817 modem.

Interface
- 56kbps USB voice/fax/modem:USB 2.0
- TD-8817 modem:USB 2.0/Ethernet Port
Depth
- 56kbps USB voice/fax/modem:200 mm
- TD-8817 modem:108 mm
Height
- 56kbps USB voice/fax/modem:20 mm
- TD-8817 modem:28 mm
Width
- 56kbps USB voice/fax/modem:20 mm
- TD-8817 modem:165 mm
Cables included
- 56kbps USB voice/fax/modem:Phone (RJ-11)
- TD-8817 modem:LAN (RJ-45), Phone (RJ-11)

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of C56U, TD-8817
30 specifications	A Conceptronic 56kbps USB voice/fax/modem Model C56U View product	B TP-Link TD-8817 modem Model TD-8817 View product
Modem1 differ
InterfaceDiffers	USB 2.0	USB 2.0/Ethernet Port
Modem typeKnown for one	V.92	Unknown — not stated by the source
Modem speedKnown for one	56 Kbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
ChipsetKnown for one	Conexant CX93010	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Upstream data rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.5 Mbit/s
Downstream data rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	24 Mbit/s
MAC address filteringKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Networking featuresKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Fast Ethernet
Supported protocolsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	ATM Forum UNI3.1/4.0 PVC - Up to 8 PVCs PPP over ATM (RFC 2364) PPP over Ethernet (RFC2516) IPoA (RFC1577/2225)
Featuresidentical
InternalKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power LEDKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
DC-in jackKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
System requirements1 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffers	Windows XP, Windows Vista, Windows 7	Windows 98SE, NT, 2000, XP, Vista, 7 MAC OS NetWare UNIX Linux
Mac compatibilityKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Minimum system requirementsKnown for one	CD-ROM	Unknown — not stated by the source
Certificatesidentical
Compliance industry standardsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IEEE 802.3, 802.3u
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 55 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 95%
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-40 - 70 °C
Non-operating relative humidity (non-condensing)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 95%
Weight & dimensions3 differ
DepthDiffers	200 mm	108 mm
HeightDiffers	20 mm	28 mm
WidthDiffers	20 mm	165 mm
WeightKnown for one	30 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging content1 differ
Cables includedDiffers	Phone (RJ-11)	LAN (RJ-45), Phone (RJ-11)
Bundled softwareKnown for one	BVRP Software	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
USB poweredKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More modem comparisons

All modem comparisons