Product comparison · 2 mobile phone cases

PanzerGlass CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Transparent Urban Combat Case w. Qi Compatible Samsung Fold8 vs PanzerGlass CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Wallet Case Black Samsung Galaxy S26 FE

Add a product
  • 18specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 10identical
  • 0known for one product only

Key differences

The PanzerGlass CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Transparent Urban Combat Case w. Qi Compatible Samsung Fold8 has 36 mm more width than the PanzerGlass CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Wallet Case Black Samsung Galaxy S26 FE (131 mm vs 95 mm). The PanzerGlass CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Wallet Case Black Samsung Galaxy S26 FE has 6.3 mm more depth than the PanzerGlass CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Transparent Urban Combat Case w. Qi Compatible Samsung Fold8 (17 mm vs 10.7 mm). The PanzerGlass CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Transparent Urban Combat Case w. Qi Compatible Samsung Fold8 has 1.5 mm more height than the PanzerGlass CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Wallet Case Black Samsung Galaxy S26 FE (166.5 mm vs 165 mm). Compatibility: Samsung - Galaxy Z Fold8 on the PanzerGlass CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Transparent Urban Combat Case w. Qi Compatible Samsung Fold8, Samsung - Galaxy new S25 FE on the PanzerGlass CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Wallet Case Black Samsung Galaxy S26 FE.

  • Compatibility
    • CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Transparent Urban Combat Case w. Qi Compatible Samsung Fold8:Samsung - Galaxy Z Fold8
    • CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Wallet Case Black Samsung Galaxy S26 FE:Samsung - Galaxy new S25 FE
  • Width
    • CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Transparent Urban Combat Case w. Qi Compatible Samsung Fold8:131 mm
    • CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Wallet Case Black Samsung Galaxy S26 FE:95 mm
  • Depth
    • CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Transparent Urban Combat Case w. Qi Compatible Samsung Fold8:10.7 mm
    • CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Wallet Case Black Samsung Galaxy S26 FE:17 mm
  • Height
    • CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Transparent Urban Combat Case w. Qi Compatible Samsung Fold8:166.5 mm
    • CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Wallet Case Black Samsung Galaxy S26 FE:165 mm
  • Weight
    • CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Transparent Urban Combat Case w. Qi Compatible Samsung Fold8:38 g
    • CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Wallet Case Black Samsung Galaxy S26 FE:88 g
  • Package width
    • CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Transparent Urban Combat Case w. Qi Compatible Samsung Fold8:110 mm
    • CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Wallet Case Black Samsung Galaxy S26 FE:108 mm
  • Package height
    • CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Transparent Urban Combat Case w. Qi Compatible Samsung Fold8:195 mm
    • CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Wallet Case Black Samsung Galaxy S26 FE:181 mm
  • Package weight
    • CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Transparent Urban Combat Case w. Qi Compatible Samsung Fold8:79 g
    • CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Wallet Case Black Samsung Galaxy S26 FE:119 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Transparent Urban Combat Case w. Qi Compatible Samsung Fold8, CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Wallet Case Black Samsung Galaxy S26 FE
18 specifications
Features1 differ
Case typeCoverCover
MaterialThermoplastic polyurethane (TPU)Thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU)
Product colourTransparentTransparent
Brand compatibilitySamsungSamsung
CompatibilityDiffersSamsung - Galaxy Z Fold8Samsung - Galaxy new S25 FE
Protection featuresScratch resistant, Shock resistantScratch resistant, Shock resistant
Easy to applyYesYes
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers131 mm95 mm
DepthDiffers10.7 mm17 mm
HeightDiffers166.5 mm165 mm
WeightDiffers38 g88 g
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per pack1 pc(s)1 pc(s)
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainable technologies and materials100% recycled post-consumer polycarbonate100% recycled post-consumer polycarbonate
Packaging data3 differ
Package widthDiffers110 mm108 mm
Package depth25 mm25 mm
Package heightDiffers195 mm181 mm
Package weightDiffers79 g119 g
Package typeHanging boxHanging box

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile phone case comparisons

All mobile phone case comparisons