Product comparison · 2 mobile phone cases

Onsala Soft Vallmo Medow iPhoneXR vs PanzerGlass® HardCase Black w. D3O® Samsung Galaxy S24+

12specifications compared
9differ
3identical
26known for one product only

Key differences

Product colour
- Soft Vallmo Medow iPhoneXR:Multicolour
- PanzerGlass® HardCase Black w. D3O® Samsung Galaxy S24+:Black
Brand compatibility
- Soft Vallmo Medow iPhoneXR:Apple
- PanzerGlass® HardCase Black w. D3O® Samsung Galaxy S24+:Samsung
Compatibility
- Soft Vallmo Medow iPhoneXR:iPhone XR
- PanzerGlass® HardCase Black w. D3O® Samsung Galaxy S24+:Samsung - Galaxy S24 Plus
Width
- Soft Vallmo Medow iPhoneXR:110 mm
- PanzerGlass® HardCase Black w. D3O® Samsung Galaxy S24+:78.8 mm
Depth
- Soft Vallmo Medow iPhoneXR:30 mm
- PanzerGlass® HardCase Black w. D3O® Samsung Galaxy S24+:10.8 mm
Height
- Soft Vallmo Medow iPhoneXR:205 mm
- PanzerGlass® HardCase Black w. D3O® Samsung Galaxy S24+:160 mm
Weight
- Soft Vallmo Medow iPhoneXR:126 g
- PanzerGlass® HardCase Black w. D3O® Samsung Galaxy S24+:30 g
Package depth
- Soft Vallmo Medow iPhoneXR:30 mm
- PanzerGlass® HardCase Black w. D3O® Samsung Galaxy S24+:18 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 577039, PanzerGlass® HardCase Black w. D3O® Samsung Galaxy S24+
38 specifications	A Onsala Soft Vallmo Medow iPhoneXR Model 577039 View product	B PanzerGlass PanzerGlass® HardCase Black w. D3O® Samsung Galaxy S24+View product
Features3 differ
Maximum screen sizeKnown for one	15.5 cm (6.1")	Unknown — not stated by the source
Product colourDiffers	Multicolour	Black
Brand compatibilityDiffers	Apple	Samsung
Surface colorationKnown for one	Image	Unknown — not stated by the source
CompatibilityDiffers	iPhone XR	Samsung - Galaxy S24 Plus
Built-in batteryKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Wireless chargingKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Desktop standKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Built-in screen coverKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Card pocketKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
MaterialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Tempered glass, Polyethylene terephthalate (PET), Silicone
Colour nameKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Black
Protection featuresKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Scratch resistant, Shock resistant
Fingerprint resistantKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Anti-yellowing protectionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Easy to applyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Oleophobic coatingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	110 mm	78.8 mm
DepthDiffers	30 mm	10.8 mm
HeightDiffers	205 mm	160 mm
WeightDiffers	126 g	30 g
ThicknessKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.08 cm
Technical detailsidentical
Combined Nomenclature (CN) codeKnown for one	42023200	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging data2 differ
Package depthDiffers	30 mm	18 mm
Package weightDiffers	140 g	54 g
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	108 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	195 mm
Package typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Hanging box
Logistics dataidentical
Customs product code (TARIC)Known for one	4202321000	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package volumeKnown for one	680 cm³	Unknown — not stated by the source
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for one	5 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Products per palletKnown for one	2000 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
UNSPSC-codeKnown for one	43191601.0	Unknown — not stated by the source
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3926909790
Certificatesidentical
Military standardKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	MIL-STD-810H

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile phone case comparisons

All mobile phone case comparisons