Product comparison · 2 mobile phone cases

Onsala Shine Vintage Birds iPhone6/7/8 vs PanzerGlass CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Flow Case Black w. MagSafe iPhone 18 Pro | 17 Pro

Add a product
  • 20specifications compared
  • 11differ
  • 9identical
  • 22known for one product only

Key differences

  • Product colour
    • Shine Vintage Birds iPhone6/7/8:Multicolour
    • CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Flow Case Black w. MagSafe iPhone 18 Pro | 17 Pro:Black
  • Colour name
    • Shine Vintage Birds iPhone6/7/8:Vintage Birds
    • CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Flow Case Black w. MagSafe iPhone 18 Pro | 17 Pro:Black
  • Width
    • Shine Vintage Birds iPhone6/7/8:105 mm
    • CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Flow Case Black w. MagSafe iPhone 18 Pro | 17 Pro:77.5 mm
  • Depth
    • Shine Vintage Birds iPhone6/7/8:25 mm
    • CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Flow Case Black w. MagSafe iPhone 18 Pro | 17 Pro:16.1 mm
  • Height
    • Shine Vintage Birds iPhone6/7/8:190 mm
    • CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Flow Case Black w. MagSafe iPhone 18 Pro | 17 Pro:156.3 mm
  • Weight
    • Shine Vintage Birds iPhone6/7/8:63 g
    • CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Flow Case Black w. MagSafe iPhone 18 Pro | 17 Pro:38 g
  • Package width
    • Shine Vintage Birds iPhone6/7/8:105 mm
    • CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Flow Case Black w. MagSafe iPhone 18 Pro | 17 Pro:108 mm
  • Package depth
    • Shine Vintage Birds iPhone6/7/8:25 mm
    • CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Flow Case Black w. MagSafe iPhone 18 Pro | 17 Pro:18 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 577015, CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Flow Case Black w. MagSafe iPhone 18 Pro | 17 Pro
42 specifications
Features3 differ
Maximum screen sizeKnown for one11.9 cm (4.7")Unknown — not stated by the source
Product colourDiffersMulticolourBlack
Colour nameDiffersVintage BirdsBlack
PatternKnown for oneFloral patternUnknown — not stated by the source
CompatibilityDiffersiPhone 6/7/8Apple - iPhone 17 Pro, Apple - iPhone 18 Pro
Built-in batteryKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Wireless chargingKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Built-in screen coverKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
MaterialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSilicone
Surface colorationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMonochromatic
MagSafe compatibleKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Protection featuresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceDrop proof, Impact resistant, Scratch resistant
Drop proof up toKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.6 m
Product made with recycled materialsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Overall recycled contentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source60%
Product recycled materialsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRecycled silicone
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers105 mm77.5 mm
DepthDiffers25 mm16.1 mm
HeightDiffers190 mm156.3 mm
WeightDiffers63 g38 g
ThicknessKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.61 cm
Technical detailsidentical
Combined Nomenclature (CN) codeKnown for one42023200Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers105 mm108 mm
Package depthDiffers25 mm18 mm
Package heightDiffers190 mm200 mm
Package weightDiffers70 g68 g
Logistics dataidentical
Customs product code (TARIC)Known for one4202321000Unknown — not stated by the source
Package volumeKnown for one500 cm³Unknown — not stated by the source
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for one5 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Products per palletKnown for one2000 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
UNSPSC-codeKnown for one43191601.0Unknown — not stated by the source
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3926909790
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainable technologies and materialsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source60% recycled post-consumer silicone

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile phone case comparisons

All mobile phone case comparisons