Product comparison · 2 mobile phone cases

iDeal of Sweden Magnet Wallet+ iPhone 15 Pro Black Croco vs iDeal of Sweden Vegan Leather Case MagSafe iPhone 15 Pro Warm Beige Croco

Add a product
  • 27specifications compared
  • 14differ
  • 13identical
  • 1known for one product only

Key differences

The iDeal of Sweden Magnet Wallet+ iPhone 15 Pro Black Croco has 15.5 mm more width than the iDeal of Sweden Vegan Leather Case MagSafe iPhone 15 Pro Warm Beige Croco (90 mm vs 74.5 mm). The iDeal of Sweden Magnet Wallet+ iPhone 15 Pro Black Croco has 2.5 mm more depth than the iDeal of Sweden Vegan Leather Case MagSafe iPhone 15 Pro Warm Beige Croco (153 mm vs 150.5 mm). The iDeal of Sweden Magnet Wallet+ iPhone 15 Pro Black Croco has 14.5 mm more height than the iDeal of Sweden Vegan Leather Case MagSafe iPhone 15 Pro Warm Beige Croco (28 mm vs 13.5 mm). Product colour: Black on the iDeal of Sweden Magnet Wallet+ iPhone 15 Pro Black Croco, Beige on the iDeal of Sweden Vegan Leather Case MagSafe iPhone 15 Pro Warm Beige Croco. Colour name: Black Croco on the iDeal of Sweden Magnet Wallet+ iPhone 15 Pro Black Croco, Warm Beige Croco on the iDeal of Sweden Vegan Leather Case MagSafe iPhone 15 Pro Warm Beige Croco.

  • Product colour
    • Magnet Wallet+ iPhone 15 Pro Black Croco:Black
    • Vegan Leather Case MagSafe iPhone 15 Pro Warm Beige Croco:Beige
  • Colour name
    • Magnet Wallet+ iPhone 15 Pro Black Croco:Black Croco
    • Vegan Leather Case MagSafe iPhone 15 Pro Warm Beige Croco:Warm Beige Croco
  • Width
    • Magnet Wallet+ iPhone 15 Pro Black Croco:90 mm
    • Vegan Leather Case MagSafe iPhone 15 Pro Warm Beige Croco:74.5 mm
  • Depth
    • Magnet Wallet+ iPhone 15 Pro Black Croco:153 mm
    • Vegan Leather Case MagSafe iPhone 15 Pro Warm Beige Croco:150.5 mm
  • Height
    • Magnet Wallet+ iPhone 15 Pro Black Croco:28 mm
    • Vegan Leather Case MagSafe iPhone 15 Pro Warm Beige Croco:13.5 mm
  • Weight
    • Magnet Wallet+ iPhone 15 Pro Black Croco:140 g
    • Vegan Leather Case MagSafe iPhone 15 Pro Warm Beige Croco:50 g
  • Package width
    • Magnet Wallet+ iPhone 15 Pro Black Croco:122 mm
    • Vegan Leather Case MagSafe iPhone 15 Pro Warm Beige Croco:108 mm
  • Package depth
    • Magnet Wallet+ iPhone 15 Pro Black Croco:218 mm
    • Vegan Leather Case MagSafe iPhone 15 Pro Warm Beige Croco:202 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of IDMWP-I2361P-334, IDVLCMS-I2361P-456
28 specifications
A

iDeal of Sweden

Magnet Wallet+ iPhone 15 Pro Black Croco

Model IDMWP-I2361P-334

View product
Features2 differ
Material detailsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source11.17% Magnet, 16.00% Paper, 9.90% Polyurethane, 62.93% Thermoplastic Polyurethane
Product colourDiffersBlackBeige
Colour nameDiffersBlack CrocoWarm Beige Croco
PatternAnimal patternAnimal pattern
Brand compatibilityAppleApple
CompatibilityiPhone 15 ProiPhone 15 Pro
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers90 mm74.5 mm
DepthDiffers153 mm150.5 mm
HeightDiffers28 mm13.5 mm
WeightDiffers140 g50 g
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers122 mm108 mm
Package depthDiffers218 mm202 mm
Package heightDiffers31 mm16 mm
Package weightDiffers370 g71 g
Logistics data4 differ
Harmonized System (HS) codeDiffers42023210003926909790
Country of originChinaChina
Shipping (inner) case GTIN (EAN/UPC)Differs73402254185297340225419366
Products per shipping (inner) case20 pc(s)20 pc(s)
Shipping (inner) case width33.8 cm33.8 cm
Shipping (inner) case length40.7 cm40.7 cm
Shipping (inner) case height15.3 cm15.3 cm
Shipping (inner) case gross weight3.2 kg3.2 kg
Master (outer) case GTIN (EAN/UPC)Differs73402254185367340225419373
Products per master (outer) caseDiffers40 pc(s)80 pc(s)
Master (outer) case width358 mm358 mm
Master (outer) case length427 mm427 mm
Master (outer) case height336 mm336 mm
Master (outer) case gross weight8 kg8 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile phone case comparisons

All mobile phone case comparisons