Product comparison · 2 mobile phone cases

iDeal of Sweden Mirror Case MagSafe iPhone 17 Pro / 18 Pro Mirror vs PanzerGlass SAFE. by PanzerGlass® TPU Case Transparent Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Bulk

Add a product
  • 14specifications compared
  • 12differ
  • 2identical
  • 27known for one product only

Key differences

The PanzerGlass SAFE. by PanzerGlass® TPU Case Transparent Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Bulk has 4.8 mm more width than the iDeal of Sweden Mirror Case MagSafe iPhone 17 Pro / 18 Pro Mirror (80.5 mm vs 75.7 mm). The iDeal of Sweden Mirror Case MagSafe iPhone 17 Pro / 18 Pro Mirror has 141.3 mm more depth than the PanzerGlass SAFE. by PanzerGlass® TPU Case Transparent Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Bulk (153.9 mm vs 12.6 mm). The PanzerGlass SAFE. by PanzerGlass® TPU Case Transparent Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Bulk has 150.4 mm more height than the iDeal of Sweden Mirror Case MagSafe iPhone 17 Pro / 18 Pro Mirror (165.7 mm vs 15.3 mm). Product colour: Silver on the iDeal of Sweden Mirror Case MagSafe iPhone 17 Pro / 18 Pro Mirror, Transparent on the PanzerGlass SAFE. by PanzerGlass® TPU Case Transparent Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Bulk. Colour name: Mirror on the iDeal of Sweden Mirror Case MagSafe iPhone 17 Pro / 18 Pro Mirror, Transparent on the PanzerGlass SAFE. by PanzerGlass® TPU Case Transparent Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Bulk.

  • Product colour
    • Mirror Case MagSafe iPhone 17 Pro / 18 Pro Mirror:Silver
    • SAFE. by PanzerGlass® TPU Case Transparent Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Bulk:Transparent
  • Colour name
    • Mirror Case MagSafe iPhone 17 Pro / 18 Pro Mirror:Mirror
    • SAFE. by PanzerGlass® TPU Case Transparent Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Bulk:Transparent
  • Brand compatibility
    • Mirror Case MagSafe iPhone 17 Pro / 18 Pro Mirror:Apple
    • SAFE. by PanzerGlass® TPU Case Transparent Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Bulk:Samsung
  • Compatibility
    • Mirror Case MagSafe iPhone 17 Pro / 18 Pro Mirror:iPhone 17 Pro/18 Pro
    • SAFE. by PanzerGlass® TPU Case Transparent Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Bulk:Samsung - Galaxy S25 Ultra
  • Width
    • Mirror Case MagSafe iPhone 17 Pro / 18 Pro Mirror:75.7 mm
    • SAFE. by PanzerGlass® TPU Case Transparent Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Bulk:80.5 mm
  • Depth
    • Mirror Case MagSafe iPhone 17 Pro / 18 Pro Mirror:153.9 mm
    • SAFE. by PanzerGlass® TPU Case Transparent Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Bulk:12.6 mm
  • Height
    • Mirror Case MagSafe iPhone 17 Pro / 18 Pro Mirror:15.3 mm
    • SAFE. by PanzerGlass® TPU Case Transparent Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Bulk:165.7 mm
  • Weight
    • Mirror Case MagSafe iPhone 17 Pro / 18 Pro Mirror:30 g
    • SAFE. by PanzerGlass® TPU Case Transparent Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Bulk:26 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of IDMRCMS-I2661P-477, SAFE. by PanzerGlass® TPU Case Transparent Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Bulk
41 specifications
Features4 differ
Case typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCover
MaterialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceThermoplastic polyurethane (TPU)
Product colourDiffersSilverTransparent
Colour nameDiffersMirrorTransparent
Brand compatibilityDiffersAppleSamsung
CompatibilityDiffersiPhone 17 Pro/18 ProSamsung - Galaxy S25 Ultra
Protection featuresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceScratch resistant, Shock resistant
Easy to applyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Overall recycled contentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100%
Product recycled materialsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceThermoplastic polyurethane (TPU)
Material detailsKnown for one1.00% BOPET Film, 8.00% Magnet, 62.00% Polycarbonate Recycled, 5.00% PET Film, 12.00% Thermoplastic Polyurethane, 12.00% Thermoplastic Polyurethane RecycledUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers75.7 mm80.5 mm
DepthDiffers153.9 mm12.6 mm
HeightDiffers15.3 mm165.7 mm
ThicknessKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.26 cm
WeightDiffers30 g26 g
Packaging contentidentical
Cleaning clothKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Dry wipeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Wet wipeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50 pc(s)
Certificatesidentical
Military standardKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMIL-STD-810H
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainable technologies and materialsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100% recycled post-consumer thermoplastic polyurethane
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers108 mm80.5 mm
Package depthDiffers202 mm12.6 mm
Package heightDiffers16 mm165.7 mm
Package weightDiffers51 g29 g
Package typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceHanging box
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) code39269097903926909790
Country of originChinaChina
Shipping (inner) case GTIN (EAN/UPC)Known for one7340225465776Unknown — not stated by the source
Products per shipping (inner) caseKnown for one20 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Shipping (inner) case widthKnown for one19 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Shipping (inner) case lengthKnown for one37.6 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Shipping (inner) case heightKnown for one13.9 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Shipping (inner) case gross weightKnown for one2.4 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case GTIN (EAN/UPC)Known for one7340225465783Unknown — not stated by the source
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for one80 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case widthKnown for one400 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for one406 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case heightKnown for one308 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for one10.5 kgUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile phone case comparisons

All mobile phone case comparisons