Product comparison · 2 mobile phone cases

Hama 00019087 mobile phone case Cover Black vs iDeal of Sweden IDPLC-I2467-51 mobile phone case

Add a product
  • 6specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 2identical
  • 10known for one product only

Key differences

  • Product colour
    • 00019087 mobile phone case Cover Black:Black
    • IDPLC-I2467-51 mobile phone case:Pink
  • Brand compatibility
    • 00019087 mobile phone case Cover Black:Google
    • IDPLC-I2467-51 mobile phone case:Apple
  • Compatibility
    • 00019087 mobile phone case Cover Black:Pixel 10/10 Pro
    • IDPLC-I2467-51 mobile phone case:iPhone 16 Plus

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 00019087, IDPLC-I2467-51
16 specifications
B

iDeal of Sweden

IDPLC-I2467-51 mobile phone case

Model IDPLC-I2467-51

View product
Features4 differ
MaterialKnown for oneThermoplastic polyurethane (TPU)Unknown — not stated by the source
Product colourDiffersBlackPink
Brand compatibilityDiffersGoogleApple
CompatibilityDiffersPixel 10/10 ProiPhone 16 Plus
Protection featuresDiffersDust resistant, Scratch resistantDrop proof
Maximum screen sizeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source17 cm (6.7")
Wireless chargingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Drop proof up toKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4 m
Product made with recycled materialsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Product recycled materialsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePolycarbonate (PC), Thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU)
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one195 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one100 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one20 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one65 gUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile phone case comparisons

All mobile phone case comparisons