Product comparison · 2 mobile phone cases

dbramante1928 Copenhagen Slim - iPhone SE/8/7/6 Series - Tan vs dbramante1928 Copenhagen Slim - iPhone SE/8/7/6 Series - Black

Add a product
  • 36specifications compared
  • 1differ
  • 35identical
  • 0known for one product only

Key differences

  • Product colour
    • Copenhagen Slim - iPhone SE/8/7/6 Series - Tan:Brown
    • Copenhagen Slim - iPhone SE/8/7/6 Series - Black:Black

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of COI8GT001063, COI8GTBL1062
36 specifications
Features1 differ
Maximum screen size11.9 cm (4.7")11.9 cm (4.7")
Case typeFolioFolio
MaterialLeatherLeather
Product colourDiffersBrownBlack
Brand compatibilityAppleApple
Surface colorationMonochromaticMonochromatic
CompatibilityiPhone SE/8/7/6iPhone SE/8/7/6
Built-in batteryNoNo
Desktop standYesYes
Built-in screen coverNoNo
Closure typeMagnetic closureMagnetic closure
Card pocketYesYes
Number of card pockets33
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Width76 mm76 mm
Depth16 mm16 mm
Height143 mm143 mm
Weight51 g51 g
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability complianceYesYes
Packaging dataidentical
Package width115 mm115 mm
Package depth25 mm25 mm
Package height205 mm205 mm
Package weight119 g119 g
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) code8517790085177900
Country of originIndiaIndia
Shipping (inner) case net weight72 g72 g
Shipping (inner) case gross weight123 g123 g
Master (outer) case width380 mm380 mm
Master (outer) case length280 mm280 mm
Master (outer) case height240 mm240 mm
Master (outer) case net weight900 g900 g
Master (outer) case gross weight900 g900 g
Master (outer) case volume25536 cm³25536 cm³
Master (outer) cases per pallet layer (EU)48 pc(s)48 pc(s)
Products per pallet (EU)1440 pc(s)1440 pc(s)
Pallet gross weight4.26 kg4.26 kg
Quantity outer carton30 pc(s)30 pc(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile phone case comparisons

All mobile phone case comparisons