Product comparison · 2 mobile phone cases

Cellularline SOFT RUBBER CASE GALAXY A27 TRANSPARENT vs PanzerGlass CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Urban Combat Case Transparent Google Pixel 9a

Add a product
  • 17specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 4identical
  • 21known for one product only

Key differences

  • Brand compatibility
    • SOFT RUBBER CASE GALAXY A27 TRANSPARENT:Samsung
    • CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Urban Combat Case Transparent Google Pixel 9a:Google
  • Compatibility
    • SOFT RUBBER CASE GALAXY A27 TRANSPARENT:Galaxy A27
    • CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Urban Combat Case Transparent Google Pixel 9a:Google - New Pixel 8a 5G
  • Width
    • SOFT RUBBER CASE GALAXY A27 TRANSPARENT:80.4 mm
    • CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Urban Combat Case Transparent Google Pixel 9a:77.2 mm
  • Depth
    • SOFT RUBBER CASE GALAXY A27 TRANSPARENT:10 mm
    • CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Urban Combat Case Transparent Google Pixel 9a:12.1 mm
  • Height
    • SOFT RUBBER CASE GALAXY A27 TRANSPARENT:165 mm
    • CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Urban Combat Case Transparent Google Pixel 9a:158.6 mm
  • Weight
    • SOFT RUBBER CASE GALAXY A27 TRANSPARENT:46 g
    • CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Urban Combat Case Transparent Google Pixel 9a:30 g
  • Package width
    • SOFT RUBBER CASE GALAXY A27 TRANSPARENT:90 mm
    • CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Urban Combat Case Transparent Google Pixel 9a:108 mm
  • Package depth
    • SOFT RUBBER CASE GALAXY A27 TRANSPARENT:13 mm
    • CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Urban Combat Case Transparent Google Pixel 9a:18 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of SOFTGALA27T, CARE™ by PanzerGlass® Urban Combat Case Transparent Google Pixel 9a
38 specifications
Features4 differ
Maximum screen sizeKnown for one17 cm (6.7")Unknown — not stated by the source
MaterialDiffersRubberThermoplastic polyurethane (TPU)
Brand compatibilityDiffersSamsungGoogle
Surface colorationKnown for oneMonochromaticUnknown — not stated by the source
CompatibilityDiffersGalaxy A27Google - New Pixel 8a 5G
Built-in batteryKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Wireless chargingKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Desktop standKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Card pocketKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Protection featuresDiffersScratch resistant, Impact resistantScratch resistant, Shock resistant
Radio Equipment Directive (RED)Known for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Warranty periodKnown for one2 year(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Colour nameKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceTransparent
Overall recycled contentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100%
Product recycled materialsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePolycarbonate (PC)
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers80.4 mm77.2 mm
DepthDiffers10 mm12.1 mm
HeightDiffers165 mm158.6 mm
WeightDiffers46 g30 g
ThicknessKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.21 cm
Packaging contentidentical
AC adapter includedKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Cleaning clothKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Dry wipeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Wet wipeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Packaging data5 differ
Package widthDiffers90 mm108 mm
Package depthDiffers13 mm18 mm
Package heightDiffers205 mm195 mm
Package weightDiffers58 g60 g
Package typeDiffersBoxHanging box
Other featuresidentical
BluetoothKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Batteries includedKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainable technologies and materialsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100% recycled post-consumer polycarbonate
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3926909790
Country of originKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceChina

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile phone case comparisons

All mobile phone case comparisons