Product comparison · 2 mobile phone cases

Buffalo 590144 mobile phone case vs Buffalo 590170 mobile phone case

Add a product
  • 19specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 11identical
  • 0known for one product only

Key differences

  • Maximum screen size
    • 590144 mobile phone case:17 cm (6.7")
    • 590170 mobile phone case:17.5 cm (6.9")
  • Product colour
    • 590144 mobile phone case:Black
    • 590170 mobile phone case:Brown
  • Compatibility
    • 590144 mobile phone case:iPhone 16 Plus
    • 590170 mobile phone case:iPhone 17 Pro Max
  • Weight
    • 590144 mobile phone case:117 g
    • 590170 mobile phone case:59 g
  • Package width
    • 590144 mobile phone case:103 mm
    • 590170 mobile phone case:100 mm
  • Package depth
    • 590144 mobile phone case:25 mm
    • 590170 mobile phone case:20 mm
  • Package height
    • 590144 mobile phone case:215 mm
    • 590170 mobile phone case:220 mm
  • Package weight
    • 590144 mobile phone case:130 g
    • 590170 mobile phone case:65 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 590144, 590170
19 specifications
Features3 differ
Maximum screen sizeDiffers17 cm (6.7")17.5 cm (6.9")
Case typeWallet caseWallet case
MaterialLeatherLeather
Product colourDiffersBlackBrown
Brand compatibilityAppleApple
Surface colorationMonochromaticMonochromatic
CompatibilityDiffersiPhone 16 PlusiPhone 17 Pro Max
Built-in batteryNoNo
MagSafe compatibleYesYes
Closure typeMagnetic closureMagnetic closure
Card pocketYesYes
Number of card pockets33
Protection featuresScratch resistantScratch resistant
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers117 g59 g
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers103 mm100 mm
Package depthDiffers25 mm20 mm
Package heightDiffers215 mm220 mm
Package weightDiffers130 g65 g
Logistics dataidentical
Country of originChinaChina

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile phone case comparisons

All mobile phone case comparisons