Product comparison · 2 mobile device keyboards

Fujitsu FPCKE513AP mobile device keyboard US English Black vs Techly Mini Keyboard UltraSlim Bluetooth 3.0 for Smartphone and Tablet ICTB1007

6specifications compared
5differ
1identical
29known for one product only

Key differences

Keyboard language
- FPCKE513AP mobile device keyboard US English Black:US English
- Mini Keyboard UltraSlim Bluetooth 3.0 for Smartphone and Tablet ICTB1007:English
Brand compatibility
- FPCKE513AP mobile device keyboard US English Black:Fujitsu
- Mini Keyboard UltraSlim Bluetooth 3.0 for Smartphone and Tablet ICTB1007:Any brand
Compatibility
- FPCKE513AP mobile device keyboard US English Black:STYLISTIC Q665
- Mini Keyboard UltraSlim Bluetooth 3.0 for Smartphone and Tablet ICTB1007:Smartphone Tablet
Product colour
- FPCKE513AP mobile device keyboard US English Black:Black
- Mini Keyboard UltraSlim Bluetooth 3.0 for Smartphone and Tablet ICTB1007:Grey
Cover
- FPCKE513AP mobile device keyboard US English Black:Yes
- Mini Keyboard UltraSlim Bluetooth 3.0 for Smartphone and Tablet ICTB1007:No

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of FPCKE513AP, ICTB1007
35 specifications	A Fujitsu FPCKE513AP mobile device keyboard US English Black Model FPCKE513AP View product	B Techly Mini Keyboard UltraSlim Bluetooth 3.0 for Smartphone and Tablet ICTB1007 Model ICTB1007 View product
Keyboard1 differ
Keyboard layoutKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	QWERTY
Keyboard languageDiffers	US English	English
Keyboard number of keysKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	61
Pointing deviceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Numeric keypad	No	No
Actuation forceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 g
Performance4 differ
Brand compatibilityDiffers	Fujitsu	Any brand
CompatibilityDiffers	STYLISTIC Q665	Smartphone Tablet
Product colourDiffers	Black	Grey
CoverDiffers	Yes	No
BacklightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Ports & interfacesidentical
Connectivity technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Wireless
Device interfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Bluetooth
Bluetooth power classKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Class 2
Bluetooth versionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.0+HS
Wireless rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 m
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Poweridentical
Power sourceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Battery
Number of batteries supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Battery voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.7 V
Battery lifeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	62.5 h
Battery lifetimeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3 year(s)
Standby timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	7 day(s)
Battery recharge timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2.5 h
Charging currentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.1 A
Charging sourceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB
Operating currentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.002 A
Standby currentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.2 mA
System requirementsidentical
Mobile operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Android, iOS
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	206 mm
DepthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	140 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 mm
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB
Batteryidentical
Battery technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion)
Battery capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	200 mAh

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile device keyboard comparisons

All mobile device keyboard comparisons