Product comparison · 2 mobile device chargers

Unisynk Charge your laptop, tablet or smartphone with this compact yet powerful USB-C Wall Charger G4. vs Verbatim Mini GaN Charger

Add a product
  • 11specifications compared
  • 3differ
  • 8identical
  • 28known for one product only

Key differences

The Unisynk Charge your laptop, tablet or smartphone with this compact yet powerful USB-C Wall Charger G4. has 50 W more maximum power than the Verbatim Mini GaN Charger (70 W vs 20 W). Fast charging technology: Power Delivery on the Unisynk Charge your laptop, tablet or smartphone with this compact yet powerful USB-C Wall Charger G4., Power Delivery 3.0 on the Verbatim Mini GaN Charger.

  • Fast charging technology
    • Charge your laptop, tablet or smartphone with this compact yet powerful USB-C Wall Charger G4.:Power Delivery
    • Mini GaN Charger:Power Delivery 3.0
  • Maximum power
    • Charge your laptop, tablet or smartphone with this compact yet powerful USB-C Wall Charger G4.:70 W
    • Mini GaN Charger:20 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 10514, 32395
39 specifications
B

Verbatim

Mini GaN Charger

Model 32395

View product
Performance2 differ
Charger typeIndoorIndoor
Charger compatibilityDiffersUniversal, Smartphone, Laptop, Mobile phone, TabletUniversal
Power source typeACAC
USB Type-C ports quantity11
Wireless chargingNoNo
Fast chargingYesYes
Fast charging technologyDiffersPower DeliveryPower Delivery 3.0
Number of simultaneously connected devices (max)11
Power protection featuresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceShort circuit, Over voltage, Over current
USB Power Delivery revisionKnown for one3.2Unknown — not stated by the source
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one100000 hUnknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Product colourWhiteWhite
Housing materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePolycarbonate (PC)
Gallium nitride (GaN) transistorsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source180 - 240 V
Input frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50/60 Hz
Input currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.7 A
Maximum powerDiffers70 W20 W
Output current (5V)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3 A
Output current (9V)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.22 A
Output current (12V)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.67 A
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source35.8 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30.2 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source67.2 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source36 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source33 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source116.5 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source60 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source60 g
Package typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceHanging box
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 - 25 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-25 - 40 °C
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per pack1 pc(s)1 pc(s)
ManualKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source85366990
Country of originKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceChina
Warranty periodKnown for one5 year(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Certificatesidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneTÜV mark, CEUnknown — not stated by the source
Sustainabilityidentical
Doesn't containKnown for onePVCUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile device charger comparisons

All mobile device charger comparisons