Product comparison · 2 mobile device chargers

TooQ GAN USB-C/PD Wall Charger vs TooQ GaN Wall Charger 2USB-C/PD + USB-A/QC

Add a product
  • 30specifications compared
  • 11differ
  • 19identical
  • 4known for one product only

Key differences

  • USB Type-C ports quantity
    • GAN USB-C/PD Wall Charger:1
    • GaN Wall Charger 2USB-C/PD + USB-A/QC:2
  • Input current
    • GAN USB-C/PD Wall Charger:0.8 A
    • GaN Wall Charger 2USB-C/PD + USB-A/QC:1.5 A
  • AC adapter power
    • GAN USB-C/PD Wall Charger:30 W
    • GaN Wall Charger 2USB-C/PD + USB-A/QC:65 W
  • Width
    • GAN USB-C/PD Wall Charger:28 mm
    • GaN Wall Charger 2USB-C/PD + USB-A/QC:23 mm
  • Depth
    • GAN USB-C/PD Wall Charger:70 mm
    • GaN Wall Charger 2USB-C/PD + USB-A/QC:93 mm
  • Height
    • GAN USB-C/PD Wall Charger:33 mm
    • GaN Wall Charger 2USB-C/PD + USB-A/QC:51 mm
  • Weight
    • GAN USB-C/PD Wall Charger:50 g
    • GaN Wall Charger 2USB-C/PD + USB-A/QC:128 g
  • Package width
    • GAN USB-C/PD Wall Charger:88 mm
    • GaN Wall Charger 2USB-C/PD + USB-A/QC:103 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of TQWC-GANPD30WT, TQWC-GANQC2PD65WT
34 specifications
Performance1 differ
USB Type-C ports quantityDiffers12
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Power2 differ
Input currentDiffers0.8 A1.5 A
AC adapter powerDiffers30 W65 W
Output current (12V)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3 A
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers28 mm23 mm
DepthDiffers70 mm93 mm
HeightDiffers33 mm51 mm
WeightDiffers50 g128 g
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers88 mm103 mm
Package depthDiffers37 mm36 mm
Package heightDiffers153 mm178 mm
Package weightDiffers66 g151 g
Other featuresidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile device charger comparisons

All mobile device charger comparisons