Product comparison · 2 mobile device chargers

Sandberg USB-C Charger Nano 100W White vs StarTech.com 30W USB‑C Wall Charger, Portable GaN Charger with USB Power Delivery Fast Charging, GaN

24specifications compared
14differ
10identical
25known for one product only

Key differences

The Sandberg USB-C Charger Nano 100W White has 90 - 240 V more input voltage than the StarTech.com 30W USB‑C Wall Charger, Portable GaN Charger with USB Power Delivery Fast Charging, GaN (200 - 240 V vs 110 - 240 V). The Sandberg USB-C Charger Nano 100W White has 0.5 A more input current than the StarTech.com 30W USB‑C Wall Charger, Portable GaN Charger with USB Power Delivery Fast Charging, GaN (1.5 A vs 1 A). The Sandberg USB-C Charger Nano 100W White has 70 W more maximum power than the StarTech.com 30W USB‑C Wall Charger, Portable GaN Charger with USB Power Delivery Fast Charging, GaN (100 W vs 30 W). Power protection features: Overheating on the Sandberg USB-C Charger Nano 100W White, Over current, Over voltage, Overheating on the StarTech.com 30W USB‑C Wall Charger, Portable GaN Charger with USB Power Delivery Fast Charging, GaN. Product colour: White on the Sandberg USB-C Charger Nano 100W White, Black on the StarTech.com 30W USB‑C Wall Charger, Portable GaN Charger with USB Power Delivery Fast Charging, GaN.

Product colour
- USB-C Charger Nano 100W White:White
- 30W USB‑C Wall Charger, Portable GaN Charger with USB Power Delivery Fast Charging, GaN:Black
Input voltage
- USB-C Charger Nano 100W White:200 - 240 V
- 30W USB‑C Wall Charger, Portable GaN Charger with USB Power Delivery Fast Charging, GaN:110 - 240 V
Input current
- USB-C Charger Nano 100W White:1.5 A
- 30W USB‑C Wall Charger, Portable GaN Charger with USB Power Delivery Fast Charging, GaN:1 A
Maximum power
- USB-C Charger Nano 100W White:100 W
- 30W USB‑C Wall Charger, Portable GaN Charger with USB Power Delivery Fast Charging, GaN:30 W
AC adapter output current
- USB-C Charger Nano 100W White:5 A
- 30W USB‑C Wall Charger, Portable GaN Charger with USB Power Delivery Fast Charging, GaN:3 A
Width
- USB-C Charger Nano 100W White:36 mm
- 30W USB‑C Wall Charger, Portable GaN Charger with USB Power Delivery Fast Charging, GaN:35.5 mm
Depth
- USB-C Charger Nano 100W White:73 mm
- 30W USB‑C Wall Charger, Portable GaN Charger with USB Power Delivery Fast Charging, GaN:68.6 mm
Height
- USB-C Charger Nano 100W White:36 mm
- 30W USB‑C Wall Charger, Portable GaN Charger with USB Power Delivery Fast Charging, GaN:27.8 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of USB-C Charger Nano 100W White, 103EB-WALL-CHARGER
49 specifications	A Sandberg USB-C Charger Nano 100W White View product	B StarTech.com 30W USB‑C Wall Charger, Portable GaN Charger with USB Power Delivery Fast Charging, GaN Model 103EB-WALL-CHARGER View product
Performance1 differ
Charger type	Indoor	Indoor
Charger compatibility	Universal	Universal
Power source type	AC	AC
USB Type-C ports quantity	1	1
Fast charging	Yes	Yes
Fast charging technologyKnown for one	Power Delivery	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of simultaneously connected devices (max)	1	1
USB Power Delivery (USB PD)	Yes	Yes
USB Power Delivery up toKnown for one	100 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power protection featuresDiffers	Overheating	Over current, Over voltage, Overheating
Wireless chargingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffers	White	Black
Cable lengthKnown for one	0 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Gallium nitride (GaN) transistors	Yes	Yes
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Power
Power4 differ
Input voltageDiffers	200 - 240 V	110 - 240 V
Input frequencyKnown for one	50/60 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Input currentDiffers	1.5 A	1 A
Maximum powerDiffers	100 W	30 W
Maximum output voltage	20 V	20 V
Minimum output voltage	5 V	5 V
AC adapter powerKnown for one	100 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC adapter output currentDiffers	5 A	3 A
Output current (5V)Known for one	3 A	Unknown — not stated by the source
Output current (9V)Known for one	3 A	Unknown — not stated by the source
Output current (12V)Known for one	3 A	Unknown — not stated by the source
Output current (15V)Known for one	3 A	Unknown — not stated by the source
Output current (20V)Known for one	5 A	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power plug typeKnown for one	Type C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	36 mm	35.5 mm
DepthDiffers	73 mm	68.6 mm
HeightDiffers	36 mm	27.8 mm
WeightDiffers	86 g	51 g
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	81 mm	80 mm
Package depthDiffers	37 mm	65 mm
Package heightDiffers	164 mm	38 mm
Package weightDiffers	125 g	90 g
Certificatesidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for one	CE, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), RoHS	Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Warranty periodKnown for one	5 year(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	440 mm
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	335 mm
Master (outer) case heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	160 mm
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	80 pc(s)
Other featuresidentical
Packaging contentKnown for one	1 Sandberg USB-C Charger Nano 100W White 1 GPSR Safety guide	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 25 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-20 - 85 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20 - 90%
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 pc(s)
Included power plug typesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	EU

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile device charger comparisons

All mobile device charger comparisons