Product comparison · 2 mobile device chargers

Philips Charger DLK50453B/05 vs Philips DLP2019/93 mobile device charger GPS, Mobile phone, Smartphone, Tablet, Universal White Cigar lighter Auto

Add a product
  • 13specifications compared
  • 11differ
  • 2identical
  • 19known for one product only

Key differences

  • Charger type
    • Charger DLK50453B/05:Indoor
    • DLP2019/93 mobile device charger GPS, Mobile phone, Smartphone, Tablet, Universal White Cigar lighter Auto:Auto
  • Power source type
    • Charger DLK50453B/05:AC
    • DLP2019/93 mobile device charger GPS, Mobile phone, Smartphone, Tablet, Universal White Cigar lighter Auto:Cigar lighter
  • Product colour
    • Charger DLK50453B/05:Black
    • DLP2019/93 mobile device charger GPS, Mobile phone, Smartphone, Tablet, Universal White Cigar lighter Auto:White
  • Input voltage
    • Charger DLK50453B/05:100 - 240 V
    • DLP2019/93 mobile device charger GPS, Mobile phone, Smartphone, Tablet, Universal White Cigar lighter Auto:12 - 24 V
  • AC adapter output current
    • Charger DLK50453B/05:8 A
    • DLP2019/93 mobile device charger GPS, Mobile phone, Smartphone, Tablet, Universal White Cigar lighter Auto:3.1 A
  • Weight
    • Charger DLK50453B/05:1.99 kg
    • DLP2019/93 mobile device charger GPS, Mobile phone, Smartphone, Tablet, Universal White Cigar lighter Auto:139 g
  • Package width
    • Charger DLK50453B/05:95 mm
    • DLP2019/93 mobile device charger GPS, Mobile phone, Smartphone, Tablet, Universal White Cigar lighter Auto:114 mm
  • Package depth
    • Charger DLK50453B/05:54 mm
    • DLP2019/93 mobile device charger GPS, Mobile phone, Smartphone, Tablet, Universal White Cigar lighter Auto:43 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of DLK50453B/05, DLP2019/93
32 specifications
A

Philips

Charger DLK50453B/05

Model DLK50453B/05

View product
Performance3 differ
Charger typeDiffersIndoorAuto
Charger compatibilityDiffersMobile phone, Smartphone, TabletGPS, Mobile phone, Smartphone, Tablet, Universal
Power source typeDiffersACCigar lighter
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one5Unknown — not stated by the source
Power protection featuresKnown for oneOver current, Over voltage, Short circuitUnknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffersBlackWhite
Cable lengthKnown for one1 mUnknown — not stated by the source
On/off switchKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Input voltageDiffers100 - 240 V12 - 24 V
Input frequencyKnown for one50 - 60 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
AC adapter output currentDiffers8 A3.1 A
Input currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.5 A
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers1.99 kg139 g
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source95 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source59.5 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source36 mm
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers95 mm114 mm
Package depthDiffers54 mm43 mm
Package heightDiffers197 mm167 mm
Package weightDiffers3.53 kg182 g
Package typeKnown for oneBoxUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneLightning, Micro-USBUnknown — not stated by the source
ManualKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Type of shelf-placementKnown for oneLaiyngUnknown — not stated by the source
Height (cm) outer cartonKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source22.7 cm
Length (cm) outer cartonKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source44.5 cm
Quantity outer cartonKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 pc(s)
Width (cm) outer cartonKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source41.5 cm
Logistics dataidentical
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4.29 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile device charger comparisons

All mobile device charger comparisons