Product comparison · 2 mobile device chargers

Lindy 70228 mobile device charger Universal Black AC Indoor vs Lindy Single Port USB Type C PD Car Charger

11specifications compared
8differ
3identical
25known for one product only

Key differences

Charger type
- 70228 mobile device charger Universal Black AC Indoor:Indoor
- Single Port USB Type C PD Car Charger:Auto
Power source type
- 70228 mobile device charger Universal Black AC Indoor:AC
- Single Port USB Type C PD Car Charger:Cigar lighter
Input voltage
- 70228 mobile device charger Universal Black AC Indoor:100 - 240 V
- Single Port USB Type C PD Car Charger:12 - 24 V
Maximum output voltage
- 70228 mobile device charger Universal Black AC Indoor:5 V
- Single Port USB Type C PD Car Charger:12 V
Width
- 70228 mobile device charger Universal Black AC Indoor:34 mm
- Single Port USB Type C PD Car Charger:20.1 mm
Depth
- 70228 mobile device charger Universal Black AC Indoor:8 mm
- Single Port USB Type C PD Car Charger:50.9 mm
Height
- 70228 mobile device charger Universal Black AC Indoor:72 mm
- Single Port USB Type C PD Car Charger:16 mm
Weight
- 70228 mobile device charger Universal Black AC Indoor:130 g
- Single Port USB Type C PD Car Charger:19 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 70228, 73301
36 specifications	A Lindy 70228 mobile device charger Universal Black AC Indoor Model 70228 View product	B Lindy Single Port USB Type C PD Car Charger Model 73301 View product
Performance2 differ
Charger typeDiffers	Indoor	Auto
Power source typeDiffers	AC	Cigar lighter
USB Type-C ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
USB Power Delivery (USB PD)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
USB Power Delivery revisionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2.0
USB Power Delivery up toKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	27 W
Designidentical
Cable lengthKnown for one	1.5 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Input voltageDiffers	100 - 240 V	12 - 24 V
Maximum powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	27 W
Maximum output voltageDiffers	5 V	12 V
Minimum output voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 V
AC adapter output currentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3 A
Input frequencyKnown for one	50-60 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Output currentKnown for one	2000 mA	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power plug typeKnown for one	Type C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	34 mm	20.1 mm
DepthDiffers	8 mm	50.9 mm
HeightDiffers	72 mm	16 mm
WeightDiffers	130 g	19 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	133 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	144 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5.67 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	24 g
Package typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Polybag
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-10 - 30 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-20 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 95%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 95%
Certificatesidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	RoHS
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CE, FCC, REACH & California Proposition 65
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	85044095
Other featuresidentical
Automatic output voltage adjustmentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Integrated USB cableKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile device charger comparisons

All mobile device charger comparisons