Product comparison · 2 mobile device chargers

i-tec 65W USB-C GaN Charger vs IOPLEE 8055776236360 mobile device charger Smartphone, Laptop, Tablet Black AC Fast charging Indoor

15specifications compared
4differ
11identical
17known for one product only

Key differences

The IOPLEE 8055776236360 mobile device charger Smartphone, Laptop, Tablet Black AC Fast charging Indoor has 5 W more maximum power than the i-tec 65W USB-C GaN Charger (70 W vs 65 W). The IOPLEE 8055776236360 mobile device charger Smartphone, Laptop, Tablet Black AC Fast charging Indoor has 0.25 A more output current (20V) than the i-tec 65W USB-C GaN Charger (3.5 A vs 3.25 A). Charger compatibility: Universal on the i-tec 65W USB-C GaN Charger, Smartphone, Laptop, Tablet on the IOPLEE 8055776236360 mobile device charger Smartphone, Laptop, Tablet Black AC Fast charging Indoor. Input voltage: 110–240 on the i-tec 65W USB-C GaN Charger, 220 - 240 V on the IOPLEE 8055776236360 mobile device charger Smartphone, Laptop, Tablet Black AC Fast charging Indoor.

Charger compatibility
- 65W USB-C GaN Charger:Universal
- 8055776236360 mobile device charger Smartphone, Laptop, Tablet Black AC Fast charging Indoor:Smartphone, Laptop, Tablet
Input voltage
- 65W USB-C GaN Charger:110–240
- 8055776236360 mobile device charger Smartphone, Laptop, Tablet Black AC Fast charging Indoor:220 - 240 V
Maximum power
- 65W USB-C GaN Charger:65 W
- 8055776236360 mobile device charger Smartphone, Laptop, Tablet Black AC Fast charging Indoor:70 W
Output current (20V)
- 65W USB-C GaN Charger:3.25 A
- 8055776236360 mobile device charger Smartphone, Laptop, Tablet Black AC Fast charging Indoor:3.5 A

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CHARGER-GAN65W, 8055776236360
32 specifications	A i-tec 65W USB-C GaN Charger Model CHARGER-GAN65W View product	B IOPLEE 8055776236360 mobile device charger Smartphone, Laptop, Tablet Black AC Fast charging Indoor Model 8055776236360 View product
Performance1 differ
Charger type	Indoor	Indoor
Charger compatibilityDiffers	Universal	Smartphone, Laptop, Tablet
Power source type	AC	AC
USB Type-C ports quantity	1	1
Wireless chargingKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Fast charging	Yes	Yes
Fast charging technologyKnown for one	GaN	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of simultaneously connected devices (max)Known for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB Power Delivery (USB PD)Known for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB Power Delivery up toKnown for one	65 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Product colour	Black	Black
Cable lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2 m
Gallium nitride (GaN) transistorsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power3 differ
Input voltageDiffers	110–240	220 - 240 V
Input frequency	50/60 Hz	50/60 Hz
Input currentKnown for one	1.5 A	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum powerDiffers	65 W	70 W
Output current (5V)	3 A	3 A
Output current (9V)	3 A	3 A
Output current (12V)	3 A	3 A
Output current (15V)	3 A	3 A
Output current (20V)Differs	3.25 A	3.5 A
Efficiency (@10 %)Known for one	88%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one	53.4 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	43.3 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	32 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one	92 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	0 - 30 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per pack	1 pc(s)	1 pc(s)
ManualKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Hanging box
Certificatesidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CE

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile device charger comparisons

All mobile device charger comparisons