Product comparison · 2 mobile device chargers

i-tec 100W USB-C GaN Charger vs Verbatim Mini GaN Charger

Add a product
  • 23specifications compared
  • 12differ
  • 11identical
  • 17known for one product only

Key differences

The i-tec 100W USB-C GaN Charger has 0.8 A more input current than the Verbatim Mini GaN Charger (1.5 A vs 0.7 A). The i-tec 100W USB-C GaN Charger has 80 W more maximum power than the Verbatim Mini GaN Charger (100 W vs 20 W). The i-tec 100W USB-C GaN Charger has 0.78 A more output current (9V) than the Verbatim Mini GaN Charger (3 A vs 2.22 A). Fast charging technology: GaN on the i-tec 100W USB-C GaN Charger, Power Delivery 3.0 on the Verbatim Mini GaN Charger. Product colour: Black on the i-tec 100W USB-C GaN Charger, White on the Verbatim Mini GaN Charger.

  • Fast charging technology
    • 100W USB-C GaN Charger:GaN
    • Mini GaN Charger:Power Delivery 3.0
  • Product colour
    • 100W USB-C GaN Charger:Black
    • Mini GaN Charger:White
  • Input voltage
    • 100W USB-C GaN Charger:110–240
    • Mini GaN Charger:180 - 240 V
  • Input current
    • 100W USB-C GaN Charger:1.5 A
    • Mini GaN Charger:0.7 A
  • Maximum power
    • 100W USB-C GaN Charger:100 W
    • Mini GaN Charger:20 W
  • Output current (9V)
    • 100W USB-C GaN Charger:3 A
    • Mini GaN Charger:2.22 A
  • Output current (12V)
    • 100W USB-C GaN Charger:3 A
    • Mini GaN Charger:1.67 A
  • Width
    • 100W USB-C GaN Charger:66 mm
    • Mini GaN Charger:35.8 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of CHARGER-GAN100W, 32396
40 specifications
A

i-tec

100W USB-C GaN Charger

Model CHARGER-GAN100W

View product
B

Verbatim

Mini GaN Charger

Model 32396

View product
Performance1 differ
Fast charging technologyDiffersGaNPower Delivery 3.0
Power protection featuresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceShort circuit, Over voltage, Over current
USB Power Delivery (USB PD)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
USB Power Delivery up toKnown for one100 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffersBlackWhite
Cable lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 m
Housing materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePolycarbonate (PC)
Power5 differ
Input voltageDiffers110–240180 - 240 V
Input currentDiffers1.5 A0.7 A
Maximum powerDiffers100 W20 W
Output current (9V)Differs3 A2.22 A
Output current (12V)Differs3 A1.67 A
Output current (15V)Known for one3 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Output current (20V)Known for one5 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Efficiency (@10 %)Known for one88%Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers66 mm35.8 mm
DepthDiffers53.9 mm30.2 mm
HeightDiffers32 mm67.2 mm
WeightDiffers188 g53 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source33.5 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source116.5 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source80 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source82 g
Package typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceHanging box
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs0 - 30 °C0 - 25 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-25 - 40 °C
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUSB Type-C
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source85366990
Country of originKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceChina

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile device charger comparisons

All mobile device charger comparisons