Product comparison · 2 mobile device chargers

HP F2G65AA Tablet Silver USB Indoor vs HP 90W Slim Combo Adapter with USB

Add a product
  • 4specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 0identical
  • 11known for one product only

Key differences

  • Charger type
    • F2G65AA Tablet Silver USB Indoor:Indoor
    • 90W Slim Combo Adapter with USB:Auto, Indoor
  • Charger compatibility
    • F2G65AA Tablet Silver USB Indoor:Tablet
    • 90W Slim Combo Adapter with USB:Laptop
  • Power source type
    • F2G65AA Tablet Silver USB Indoor:USB
    • 90W Slim Combo Adapter with USB:AC, Cigar lighter
  • Product colour
    • F2G65AA Tablet Silver USB Indoor:Silver
    • 90W Slim Combo Adapter with USB:Black

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of F2G65AA, H6Y84AA
15 specifications
Performance3 differ
Charger typeDiffersIndoorAuto, Indoor
Charger compatibilityDiffersTabletLaptop
Power source typeDiffersUSBAC, Cigar lighter
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
CompatibilityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceHP
HP segmentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBusiness
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffersSilverBlack
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Cables includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAC
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source85044090
Other featuresidentical
Charging connectorKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one125 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one120 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one75 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one280 gUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile device charger comparisons

All mobile device charger comparisons