Product comparison · 2 mobile device chargers

Hama Quick & Travel Charger / LG KG800 Chocolate vs Philips DLM99995/97 mobile device charger MP3, Mobile phone Black AC, USB Indoor

Add a product
  • 8specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 2identical
  • 27known for one product only

Key differences

  • Charger compatibility
    • Quick & Travel Charger / LG KG800 Chocolate:Mobile phone
    • DLM99995/97 mobile device charger MP3, Mobile phone Black AC, USB Indoor:MP3, Mobile phone
  • Compatibility
    • Quick & Travel Charger / LG KG800 Chocolate:LG KG800 Chocolate
    • DLM99995/97 mobile device charger MP3, Mobile phone Black AC, USB Indoor:Apple: iPhone, 3G, iPod
  • Package width
    • Quick & Travel Charger / LG KG800 Chocolate:230 mm
    • DLM99995/97 mobile device charger MP3, Mobile phone Black AC, USB Indoor:51 mm
  • Package depth
    • Quick & Travel Charger / LG KG800 Chocolate:90 mm
    • DLM99995/97 mobile device charger MP3, Mobile phone Black AC, USB Indoor:141 mm
  • Package height
    • Quick & Travel Charger / LG KG800 Chocolate:40 mm
    • DLM99995/97 mobile device charger MP3, Mobile phone Black AC, USB Indoor:102 mm
  • Package weight
    • Quick & Travel Charger / LG KG800 Chocolate:115 g
    • DLM99995/97 mobile device charger MP3, Mobile phone Black AC, USB Indoor:65 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of Quick & Travel Charger / LG KG800 Chocolate, DLM99995/97
35 specifications
Performance2 differ
Charger compatibilityDiffersMobile phoneMP3, Mobile phone
Power source typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAC, USB
CompatibilityDiffersLG KG800 ChocolateApple: iPhone, 3G, iPod
Designidentical
LED indicatorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePower
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source49 g
Packaging data4 differ
Package tare weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source16 g
Package widthDiffers230 mm51 mm
Package depthDiffers90 mm141 mm
Package heightDiffers40 mm102 mm
Package weightDiffers115 g65 g
Package typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCarton
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Logistics dataidentical
EAN/UPC/GTIN (packaging)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source609585172616
Master (outer) case GTIN (EAN/UPC)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20609585172610
Shipping (inner) case GTIN (EAN/UPC)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10609585172613
Other featuresidentical
Gross weight inner cartonKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.544 kg
Gross weight of outer cartonKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.538 kg
Height (cm) inner cartonKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20.5 cm
Height (cm) outer cartonKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source36.8 cm
Length (cm) inner cartonKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source24.6 cm
Length (cm) outer cartonKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source51.6 cm
Net weight inner cartonKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.294 kg
Net weight of outer cartonKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.764 kg
Packaging net weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.049 kg
Packaging tare weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.016 kg
Quantity inner cartonKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source6 pc(s)
Quantity outer cartonKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source36 pc(s)
Tare weight inner cartonKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.25 kg
Tare weight outer cartonKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.774 kg
Width (cm) inner cartonKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source11.4 cm
Width (cm) outer cartonKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source22.4 cm
Poweridentical
Input voltageKnown for one100 - 240 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Input frequencyKnown for one50/60 HzUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile device charger comparisons

All mobile device charger comparisons