Product comparison · 2 mobile device chargers

Hama 00201942 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset White AC Fast charging Indoor vs StarTech.com 65W USB-C Laptop Charger, GaN Charger with Power Adapter Brick for Dell, XPS, HP ProBook, MacBook Pro, Microsoft Surface Pro, Black

Add a product
  • 16specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 10identical
  • 34known for one product only

Key differences

The Hama 00201942 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset White AC Fast charging Indoor has 120 - 240 V more input voltage than the StarTech.com 65W USB-C Laptop Charger, GaN Charger with Power Adapter Brick for Dell, XPS, HP ProBook, MacBook Pro, Microsoft Surface Pro, Black (220 - 240 V vs 100 - 240 V). The Hama 00201942 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset White AC Fast charging Indoor has 35 W more maximum power than the StarTech.com 65W USB-C Laptop Charger, GaN Charger with Power Adapter Brick for Dell, XPS, HP ProBook, MacBook Pro, Microsoft Surface Pro, Black (100 W vs 65 W). Power protection features: Over current, Overload, Short circuit on the Hama 00201942 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset White AC Fast charging Indoor, Over voltage, Over current, Overheating on the StarTech.com 65W USB-C Laptop Charger, GaN Charger with Power Adapter Brick for Dell, XPS, HP ProBook, MacBook Pro, Microsoft Surface Pro, Black. Product colour: White on the Hama 00201942 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset White AC Fast charging Indoor, Black on the StarTech.com 65W USB-C Laptop Charger, GaN Charger with Power Adapter Brick for Dell, XPS, HP ProBook, MacBook Pro, Microsoft Surface Pro, Black.

  • Product colour
    • 00201942 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset White AC Fast charging Indoor:White
    • 65W USB-C Laptop Charger, GaN Charger with Power Adapter Brick for Dell, XPS, HP ProBook, MacBook Pro, Microsoft Surface Pro, Black:Black
  • Input voltage
    • 00201942 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset White AC Fast charging Indoor:220 - 240 V
    • 65W USB-C Laptop Charger, GaN Charger with Power Adapter Brick for Dell, XPS, HP ProBook, MacBook Pro, Microsoft Surface Pro, Black:100 - 240 V
  • Maximum power
    • 00201942 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset White AC Fast charging Indoor:100 W
    • 65W USB-C Laptop Charger, GaN Charger with Power Adapter Brick for Dell, XPS, HP ProBook, MacBook Pro, Microsoft Surface Pro, Black:65 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 00201942, 1065EB-WALL-CHARGER
50 specifications
Performance3 differ
Charger compatibilityDiffersSmartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, HeadsetUniversal
Fast charging technologyDiffersPower Delivery 3.0, Quick Charge 2.0, Quick Charge 3.0Power Delivery 3.0, Programmable Power Supply (PPS)
Programmable power supply (PPS)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power protection featuresDiffersOver current, Overload, Short circuitOver voltage, Over current, Overheating
USB Power Delivery up toKnown for one100 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffersWhiteBlack
Power2 differ
Input voltageDiffers220 - 240 V100 - 240 V
Input currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 A
Maximum powerDiffers100 W65 W
Maximum output voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 V
Minimum output voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 V
AC adapter output currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 A
Input frequencyKnown for one50/60 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Output current (5V)Known for one3 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Output current (9V)Known for one3 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Output current (15V)Known for one3 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Output current (20V)Known for one5 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Average active efficiencyKnown for one81.4Unknown — not stated by the source
Efficiency at low load (10%)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Efficiency (@10 %)Known for one74.7%Unknown — not stated by the source
Power plug typeKnown for oneType CUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source56.2 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source87.2 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source28.7 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source329 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source110 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source110 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source40 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source161 g
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 - 25 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-20 - 80 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 - 90%
Packaging contentidentical
Included power plug typesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceEU
ManualKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Certificatesidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRoHS, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), cULus, PSE
Logistics dataidentical
Master (outer) case widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source455 mm
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source245 mm
Master (outer) case heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source250 mm
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source40 pc(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile device charger comparisons

All mobile device charger comparisons