Product comparison · 2 mobile device chargers

Hama 00201942 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset White AC Fast charging Indoor vs IOPLEE 8055776236360 mobile device charger Smartphone, Laptop, Tablet Black AC Fast charging Indoor

15specifications compared
4differ
11identical
16known for one product only

Key differences

The Hama 00201942 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset White AC Fast charging Indoor has 30 W more maximum power than the IOPLEE 8055776236360 mobile device charger Smartphone, Laptop, Tablet Black AC Fast charging Indoor (100 W vs 70 W). The Hama 00201942 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset White AC Fast charging Indoor has 1.5 A more output current (20V) than the IOPLEE 8055776236360 mobile device charger Smartphone, Laptop, Tablet Black AC Fast charging Indoor (5 A vs 3.5 A). Product colour: White on the Hama 00201942 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset White AC Fast charging Indoor, Black on the IOPLEE 8055776236360 mobile device charger Smartphone, Laptop, Tablet Black AC Fast charging Indoor.

Product colour
- 00201942 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset White AC Fast charging Indoor:White
- 8055776236360 mobile device charger Smartphone, Laptop, Tablet Black AC Fast charging Indoor:Black
Maximum power
- 00201942 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset White AC Fast charging Indoor:100 W
- 8055776236360 mobile device charger Smartphone, Laptop, Tablet Black AC Fast charging Indoor:70 W
Output current (20V)
- 00201942 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset White AC Fast charging Indoor:5 A
- 8055776236360 mobile device charger Smartphone, Laptop, Tablet Black AC Fast charging Indoor:3.5 A

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 00201942, 8055776236360
31 specifications	A Hama 00201942 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset White AC Fast charging Indoor Model 00201942 View product	B IOPLEE 8055776236360 mobile device charger Smartphone, Laptop, Tablet Black AC Fast charging Indoor Model 8055776236360 View product
Performance1 differ
Charger compatibilityDiffers	Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset	Smartphone, Laptop, Tablet
Wireless chargingKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Fast charging technologyKnown for one	Power Delivery 3.0, Quick Charge 2.0, Quick Charge 3.0	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of simultaneously connected devices (max)Known for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB Power Delivery (USB PD)Known for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB Power Delivery revisionKnown for one	3.0	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB Power Delivery up toKnown for one	100 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power protection featuresKnown for one	Over current, Overload, Short circuit	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffers	White	Black
Cable lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2 m
Power2 differ
Maximum powerDiffers	100 W	70 W
Output current (20V)Differs	5 A	3.5 A
Average active efficiencyKnown for one	81.4	Unknown — not stated by the source
Efficiency at low load (10%)Known for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Efficiency (@10 %)Known for one	74.7%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power plug typeKnown for one	Type C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Output current (12V)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3 A
Packaging contentidentical
ManualKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Hanging box
Certificatesidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CE

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile device charger comparisons

All mobile device charger comparisons