Product comparison · 2 mobile device chargers

Hama 00201942 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset White AC Fast charging Indoor vs i-tec 65W USB-C GaN Charger

Add a product
  • 21specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 13identical
  • 13known for one product only

Key differences

The Hama 00201942 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset White AC Fast charging Indoor has 35 W more USB Power Delivery up to than the i-tec 65W USB-C GaN Charger (100 W vs 65 W). The Hama 00201942 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset White AC Fast charging Indoor has 35 W more maximum power than the i-tec 65W USB-C GaN Charger (100 W vs 65 W). The Hama 00201942 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset White AC Fast charging Indoor has 1.75 A more output current (20V) than the i-tec 65W USB-C GaN Charger (5 A vs 3.25 A). Product colour: White on the Hama 00201942 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset White AC Fast charging Indoor, Black on the i-tec 65W USB-C GaN Charger. Input voltage: 220 - 240 V on the Hama 00201942 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset White AC Fast charging Indoor, 110–240 on the i-tec 65W USB-C GaN Charger.

  • USB Power Delivery up to
    • 00201942 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset White AC Fast charging Indoor:100 W
    • 65W USB-C GaN Charger:65 W
  • Product colour
    • 00201942 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset White AC Fast charging Indoor:White
    • 65W USB-C GaN Charger:Black
  • Input voltage
    • 00201942 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset White AC Fast charging Indoor:220 - 240 V
    • 65W USB-C GaN Charger:110–240
  • Maximum power
    • 00201942 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset White AC Fast charging Indoor:100 W
    • 65W USB-C GaN Charger:65 W
  • Output current (20V)
    • 00201942 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset White AC Fast charging Indoor:5 A
    • 65W USB-C GaN Charger:3.25 A
  • Efficiency (@10 %)
    • 00201942 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset White AC Fast charging Indoor:74.7%
    • 65W USB-C GaN Charger:88%

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 00201942, CHARGER-GAN65W
34 specifications
B

i-tec

65W USB-C GaN Charger

Model CHARGER-GAN65W

View product
Performance3 differ
Charger compatibilityDiffersSmartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, HeadsetUniversal
Fast charging technologyDiffersPower Delivery 3.0, Quick Charge 2.0, Quick Charge 3.0GaN
USB Power Delivery up toDiffers100 W65 W
USB Power Delivery revisionKnown for one3.0Unknown — not stated by the source
Power protection featuresKnown for oneOver current, Overload, Short circuitUnknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffersWhiteBlack
Gallium nitride (GaN) transistorsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power4 differ
Input voltageDiffers220 - 240 V110–240
Input currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.5 A
Maximum powerDiffers100 W65 W
Output current (12V)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3 A
Output current (20V)Differs5 A3.25 A
Efficiency (@10 %)Differs74.7%88%
Average active efficiencyKnown for one81.4Unknown — not stated by the source
Efficiency at low load (10%)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power plug typeKnown for oneType CUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source53.4 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source43.3 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source32 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source92 g
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 - 30 °C

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile device charger comparisons

All mobile device charger comparisons