Product comparison · 2 mobile device chargers

Hama 00183235 mobile device charger Universal White Cigar lighter Auto vs Hama 00183245 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet Black AC Indoor

16specifications compared
9differ
7identical
3known for one product only

Key differences

The Hama 00183235 mobile device charger Universal White Cigar lighter Auto has 3 W more maximum power than the Hama 00183245 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet Black AC Indoor (15 W vs 12 W). The Hama 00183235 mobile device charger Universal White Cigar lighter Auto has 0.6 A more AC adapter output current than the Hama 00183245 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet Black AC Indoor (3 A vs 2.4 A). The Hama 00183245 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet Black AC Indoor has 78 g more package weight than the Hama 00183235 mobile device charger Universal White Cigar lighter Auto (169 g vs 91 g). Charger type: Auto on the Hama 00183235 mobile device charger Universal White Cigar lighter Auto, Indoor on the Hama 00183245 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet Black AC Indoor. Charger compatibility: Universal on the Hama 00183235 mobile device charger Universal White Cigar lighter Auto, Smartphone, Tablet on the Hama 00183245 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet Black AC Indoor.

Charger type
- 00183235 mobile device charger Universal White Cigar lighter Auto:Auto
- 00183245 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet Black AC Indoor:Indoor
Charger compatibility
- 00183235 mobile device charger Universal White Cigar lighter Auto:Universal
- 00183245 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet Black AC Indoor:Smartphone, Tablet
Power source type
- 00183235 mobile device charger Universal White Cigar lighter Auto:Cigar lighter
- 00183245 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet Black AC Indoor:AC
Product colour
- 00183235 mobile device charger Universal White Cigar lighter Auto:White
- 00183245 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet Black AC Indoor:Black
LED indicators
- 00183235 mobile device charger Universal White Cigar lighter Auto:Yes
- 00183245 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet Black AC Indoor:Status
Input voltage
- 00183235 mobile device charger Universal White Cigar lighter Auto:12-24 V
- 00183245 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet Black AC Indoor:100 - 240 V
Maximum power
- 00183235 mobile device charger Universal White Cigar lighter Auto:15 W
- 00183245 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet Black AC Indoor:12 W
AC adapter output current
- 00183235 mobile device charger Universal White Cigar lighter Auto:3 A
- 00183245 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet Black AC Indoor:2.4 A

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 00183235, 00183245
19 specifications	A Hama 00183235 mobile device charger Universal White Cigar lighter Auto Model 00183235 View product	B Hama 00183245 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet Black AC Indoor Model 00183245 View product
Performance3 differ
Charger typeDiffers	Auto	Indoor
Charger compatibilityDiffers	Universal	Smartphone, Tablet
Power source typeDiffers	Cigar lighter	AC
USB Type-C ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power protection features	Over voltage, Overcharge, Short circuit	Over voltage, Overcharge, Short circuit
Design2 differ
Product colourDiffers	White	Black
Cable length	1 m	1 m
LED indicatorsDiffers	Yes	Status
Power3 differ
Input voltageDiffers	12-24 V	100 - 240 V
Maximum powerDiffers	15 W	12 W
Maximum output voltage	5 V	5 V
AC adapter output currentDiffers	3 A	2.4 A
Power plug typeKnown for one	Type C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging data1 differ
Package width	195 mm	195 mm
Package depth	90 mm	90 mm
Package height	31 mm	31 mm
Package weightDiffers	91 g	169 g
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per pack	1 pc(s)	1 pc(s)
Cables includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Micro-USB

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile device charger comparisons

All mobile device charger comparisons