Product comparison · 2 mobile device chargers

Hama 00183229 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet Black Cigar lighter Fast charging Auto vs Verbatim 49551 mobile device charger Mobile phone Black USB Wireless charging Fast charging Indoor

Add a product
  • 13specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 5identical
  • 14known for one product only

Key differences

  • Charger type
    • 00183229 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet Black Cigar lighter Fast charging Auto:Auto
    • 49551 mobile device charger Mobile phone Black USB Wireless charging Fast charging Indoor:Indoor
  • Charger compatibility
    • 00183229 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet Black Cigar lighter Fast charging Auto:Smartphone, Tablet
    • 49551 mobile device charger Mobile phone Black USB Wireless charging Fast charging Indoor:Mobile phone
  • Power source type
    • 00183229 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet Black Cigar lighter Fast charging Auto:Cigar lighter
    • 49551 mobile device charger Mobile phone Black USB Wireless charging Fast charging Indoor:USB
  • LED indicators
    • 00183229 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet Black Cigar lighter Fast charging Auto:Status
    • 49551 mobile device charger Mobile phone Black USB Wireless charging Fast charging Indoor:Charging, Power
  • Input voltage
    • 00183229 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet Black Cigar lighter Fast charging Auto:12 - 24 V
    • 49551 mobile device charger Mobile phone Black USB Wireless charging Fast charging Indoor:9 V
  • Maximum power
    • 00183229 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet Black Cigar lighter Fast charging Auto:27 W
    • 49551 mobile device charger Mobile phone Black USB Wireless charging Fast charging Indoor:10 W
  • AC adapter output current
    • 00183229 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet Black Cigar lighter Fast charging Auto:3 A
    • 49551 mobile device charger Mobile phone Black USB Wireless charging Fast charging Indoor:1.1 A
  • Cables included
    • 00183229 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet Black Cigar lighter Fast charging Auto:USB Type-C
    • 49551 mobile device charger Mobile phone Black USB Wireless charging Fast charging Indoor:USB

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 00183229, 49551
27 specifications
Performance3 differ
Charger typeDiffersAutoIndoor
Charger compatibilityDiffersSmartphone, TabletMobile phone
Power source typeDiffersCigar lighterUSB
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Wireless chargingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Fast chargingYesYes
Basic device typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMobile phone
USB Type-C ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
USB Power Delivery (USB PD)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
USB Power Delivery revisionKnown for one2.0Unknown — not stated by the source
Power protection featuresKnown for oneOver voltage, Overcharge, Short circuitUnknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Product colourBlackBlack
LED indicatorsDiffersStatusCharging, Power
Cable lengthKnown for one1.5 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Power3 differ
Input voltageDiffers12 - 24 V9 V
Input currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 A
Maximum powerDiffers27 W10 W
Maximum output voltage9 V9 V
Minimum output voltage5 V5 V
AC adapter output currentDiffers3 A1.1 A
Weight & dimensionsidentical
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source99 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source9 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source150 g
Packaging content1 differ
Quantity per pack1 pc(s)1 pc(s)
Cables includedDiffersUSB Type-CUSB
Other featuresidentical
User guideKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Connector contacts platingKnown for oneGoldUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile device charger comparisons

All mobile device charger comparisons