Product comparison · 2 mobile device chargers

Hama 00178336 mobile device charger Mobile phone Black AC Indoor vs Hama 00178337 mobile device charger Mobile phone Black Cigar lighter Auto

Add a product
  • 14specifications compared
  • 3differ
  • 11identical
  • 5known for one product only

Key differences

  • Charger type
    • 00178336 mobile device charger Mobile phone Black AC Indoor:Indoor
    • 00178337 mobile device charger Mobile phone Black Cigar lighter Auto:Auto
  • Power source type
    • 00178336 mobile device charger Mobile phone Black AC Indoor:AC
    • 00178337 mobile device charger Mobile phone Black Cigar lighter Auto:Cigar lighter
  • Package weight
    • 00178336 mobile device charger Mobile phone Black AC Indoor:169 g
    • 00178337 mobile device charger Mobile phone Black Cigar lighter Auto:123 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 00178336, 00178337
19 specifications
Performance2 differ
Charger typeDiffersIndoorAuto
Charger compatibilityMobile phoneMobile phone
Power source typeDiffersACCigar lighter
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantity11
Operating principleKnown for oneContactUnknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Product colourBlackBlack
Cable lengthKnown for one1.5 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Plug and PlayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Input voltageKnown for one100 - 240 VUnknown — not stated by the source
AC adapter output currentKnown for one3 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging data1 differ
Package width195 mm195 mm
Package depth92 mm92 mm
Package height33 mm33 mm
Package weightDiffers169 g123 g
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per pack1 pc(s)1 pc(s)
Cables includedUSBUSB
ManualYesYes
Other featuresidentical
Charging connectorYesYes
Number of connectors11

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile device charger comparisons

All mobile device charger comparisons