Product comparison · 2 mobile device chargers

CLUB3D USB-C® Two Ports Slim Charger vs Ugreen Zapix 45W USB-C GaN Fast Charger

14specifications compared
7differ
7identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

The CLUB3D USB-C® Two Ports Slim Charger has 1 more simultaneously connected devices (max) than the Ugreen Zapix 45W USB-C GaN Fast Charger (2 vs 1). The Ugreen Zapix 45W USB-C GaN Fast Charger has 30 g more weight than the CLUB3D USB-C® Two Ports Slim Charger (160 g vs 130 g). The Ugreen Zapix 45W USB-C GaN Fast Charger has 50 mm more package width than the CLUB3D USB-C® Two Ports Slim Charger (150 mm vs 100 mm). Fast charging technology: GaN, Power Delivery 3.1 on the CLUB3D USB-C® Two Ports Slim Charger, GaN on the Ugreen Zapix 45W USB-C GaN Fast Charger.

Fast charging technology
- USB-C® Two Ports Slim Charger:GaN, Power Delivery 3.1
- Zapix 45W USB-C GaN Fast Charger:GaN
Number of simultaneously connected devices (max)
- USB-C® Two Ports Slim Charger:2
- Zapix 45W USB-C GaN Fast Charger:1
Weight
- USB-C® Two Ports Slim Charger:130 g
- Zapix 45W USB-C GaN Fast Charger:160 g
Package width
- USB-C® Two Ports Slim Charger:100 mm
- Zapix 45W USB-C GaN Fast Charger:150 mm
Package depth
- USB-C® Two Ports Slim Charger:65 mm
- Zapix 45W USB-C GaN Fast Charger:100 mm
Package height
- USB-C® Two Ports Slim Charger:60 mm
- Zapix 45W USB-C GaN Fast Charger:56 mm
Package weight
- USB-C® Two Ports Slim Charger:20 g
- Zapix 45W USB-C GaN Fast Charger:180 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CAC-1935, 65056B
35 specifications	A CLUB3D USB-C® Two Ports Slim Charger Model CAC-1935 View product	B Ugreen Zapix 45W USB-C GaN Fast Charger Model 65056B View product
Performance2 differ
Fast charging technologyDiffers	GaN, Power Delivery 3.1	GaN
Number of simultaneously connected devices (max)Differs	2	1
Programmable power supply (PPS)Known for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB Power Delivery (USB PD)Known for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
MagSafe compatibleKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB Type-C ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
USB Power Delivery revisionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.0
USB Power Delivery up toKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	45 W
CompatibilityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	MacBook Air, iPad Pro, iPhone 15/14/13 series, Samsung Galaxy S23/S24, Google Pixel, Steam Deck, Switch, and other USB-C devices
Designidentical
Housing materialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Polycarbonate (PC)
Poweridentical
Maximum powerKnown for one	65 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Input frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50-60 Hz
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for one	84 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	50 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	52 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers	130 g	160 g
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	100 mm	150 mm
Package depthDiffers	65 mm	100 mm
Package heightDiffers	60 mm	56 mm
Package weightDiffers	20 g	180 g
Package typeKnown for one	Box	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging compositionidentical
Paper/cardboard packaging weightKnown for one	20 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Plastic packaging weightKnown for one	3 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Total paper/cardboard packaging weightKnown for one	0 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Total plastic packaging weightKnown for one	0 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	8504 4095	Unknown — not stated by the source
Country of originKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	China
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 pc(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile device charger comparisons

All mobile device charger comparisons