Product comparison · 2 mobile device chargers

CLUB3D USB-C® Two Ports Slim Charger vs i-tec 65W USB-C GaN Charger

15specifications compared
7differ
8identical
25known for one product only

Key differences

The CLUB3D USB-C® Two Ports Slim Charger has 1 more simultaneously connected devices (max) than the i-tec 65W USB-C GaN Charger (2 vs 1). The CLUB3D USB-C® Two Ports Slim Charger has 30.6 mm more width than the i-tec 65W USB-C GaN Charger (84 mm vs 53.4 mm). The CLUB3D USB-C® Two Ports Slim Charger has 6.7 mm more depth than the i-tec 65W USB-C GaN Charger (50 mm vs 43.3 mm). Fast charging technology: GaN, Power Delivery 3.1 on the CLUB3D USB-C® Two Ports Slim Charger, GaN on the i-tec 65W USB-C GaN Charger. Input voltage: 100-240 V on the CLUB3D USB-C® Two Ports Slim Charger, 110–240 on the i-tec 65W USB-C GaN Charger.

Fast charging technology
- USB-C® Two Ports Slim Charger:GaN, Power Delivery 3.1
- 65W USB-C GaN Charger:GaN
Number of simultaneously connected devices (max)
- USB-C® Two Ports Slim Charger:2
- 65W USB-C GaN Charger:1
Input voltage
- USB-C® Two Ports Slim Charger:100-240 V
- 65W USB-C GaN Charger:110–240
Width
- USB-C® Two Ports Slim Charger:84 mm
- 65W USB-C GaN Charger:53.4 mm
Depth
- USB-C® Two Ports Slim Charger:50 mm
- 65W USB-C GaN Charger:43.3 mm
Height
- USB-C® Two Ports Slim Charger:52 mm
- 65W USB-C GaN Charger:32 mm
Weight
- USB-C® Two Ports Slim Charger:130 g
- 65W USB-C GaN Charger:92 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CAC-1935, CHARGER-GAN65W
40 specifications	A CLUB3D USB-C® Two Ports Slim Charger Model CAC-1935 View product	B i-tec 65W USB-C GaN Charger Model CHARGER-GAN65W View product
Performance2 differ
USB Type-C ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Fast charging technologyDiffers	GaN, Power Delivery 3.1	GaN
Number of simultaneously connected devices (max)Differs	2	1
USB Power Delivery up toKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	65 W
Programmable power supply (PPS)Known for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
MagSafe compatibleKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Input voltageDiffers	100-240 V	110–240
Input frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50/60 Hz
Input currentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.5 A
Output current (5V)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3 A
Output current (9V)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3 A
Output current (12V)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3 A
Output current (15V)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3 A
Output current (20V)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.25 A
Efficiency (@10 %)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	88%
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	84 mm	53.4 mm
DepthDiffers	50 mm	43.3 mm
HeightDiffers	52 mm	32 mm
WeightDiffers	130 g	92 g
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 30 °C
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 pc(s)
ManualKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	100 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	65 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	60 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	20 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package typeKnown for one	Box	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging compositionidentical
Paper/cardboard packaging weightKnown for one	20 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Plastic packaging weightKnown for one	3 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Total paper/cardboard packaging weightKnown for one	0 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Total plastic packaging weightKnown for one	0 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	8504 4095	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile device charger comparisons

All mobile device charger comparisons