All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 mobile device chargers

CLUB3D CAC-1933 4-Port USB-C® Charging Station vs StarTech.com 30W USB‑C Wall Charger, Portable GaN Charger with USB Power Delivery Fast Charging, GaN

Add a product
  • 17specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 7identical
  • 27known for one product only

Key differences

The CLUB3D CAC-1933 4-Port USB-C® Charging Station has 3 more USB Type-C ports quantity than the StarTech.com 30W USB‑C Wall Charger, Portable GaN Charger with USB Power Delivery Fast Charging, GaN (4 vs 1). The CLUB3D CAC-1933 4-Port USB-C® Charging Station has 3 more simultaneously connected devices (max) than the StarTech.com 30W USB‑C Wall Charger, Portable GaN Charger with USB Power Delivery Fast Charging, GaN (4 vs 1). The CLUB3D CAC-1933 4-Port USB-C® Charging Station has 86.5 mm more width than the StarTech.com 30W USB‑C Wall Charger, Portable GaN Charger with USB Power Delivery Fast Charging, GaN (122 mm vs 35.5 mm).

  • USB Type-C ports quantity
    • 4
    • 1
  • Number of simultaneously connected devices (max)
    • 4
    • 1
  • Width
    • 122 mm
    • 35.5 mm
  • Depth
    • 88 mm
    • 68.6 mm
  • Height
    • 38 mm
    • 27.8 mm
  • Weight
    • 667 g
    • 51 g
  • Package width
    • 175 mm
    • 80 mm
  • Package depth
    • 175 mm
    • 65 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
44 specifications
A

CLUB3D

CAC-1933 4-Port USB-C® Charging Station

Model CAC-1933

View product
B

StarTech.com

30W USB‑C Wall Charger, Portable GaN Charger with USB Power Delivery Fast Charging, GaN

Model 103EB-WALL-CHARGER

View product
Performance2 differ
Charger typeIndoorIndoor
Charger compatibilityUniversalUniversal
Power source typeACAC
USB Type-C ports quantityDiffers41
Wireless chargingNoNo
Fast chargingYesYes
Number of simultaneously connected devices (max)Differs41
USB Power Delivery (USB PD)Known for oneYes
Power protection featuresKnown for oneOver current, Over voltage, Overheating
Fast charging technologyKnown for oneGaN
MagSafe compatibleKnown for oneNo
Designidentical
Product colourBlackBlack
LED indicatorsKnown for onePower
Gallium nitride (GaN) transistorsKnown for oneYes
Cable lengthKnown for one1.8 m
Poweridentical
Input voltageKnown for one110 - 240 V
Input currentKnown for one1 A
Maximum powerKnown for one30 W
Maximum output voltageKnown for one20 V
Minimum output voltageKnown for one5 V
AC adapter output currentKnown for one3 A
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers122 mm35.5 mm
DepthDiffers88 mm68.6 mm
HeightDiffers38 mm27.8 mm
WeightDiffers667 g51 g
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers175 mm80 mm
Package depthDiffers175 mm65 mm
Package heightDiffers60 mm38 mm
Package weightDiffers70 g90 g
Package typeKnown for oneBox
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one0 - 25 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-20 - 85 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one20 - 90%
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per pack1 pc(s)1 pc(s)
Included power plug typesKnown for oneEU
Logistics dataidentical
Master (outer) case widthKnown for one440 mm
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for one335 mm
Master (outer) case heightKnown for one160 mm
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for one80 pc(s)
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one8504 4095
Packaging compositionidentical
Paper/cardboard packaging weightKnown for one59 g
Plastic packaging weightKnown for one3 g
Total paper/cardboard packaging weightKnown for one0 g
Total plastic packaging weightKnown for one0 g

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile device charger comparisons

All mobile device charger comparisons