Product comparison · 2 mobile device chargers

CLUB3D CAC-1933 4-Port USB-C® Charging Station vs InLine 31590 mobile device charger Universal Black AC Fast charging Indoor

Add a product
  • 18specifications compared
  • 12differ
  • 6identical
  • 35known for one product only

Key differences

The CLUB3D CAC-1933 4-Port USB-C® Charging Station has 2 more USB Type-C ports quantity than the InLine 31590 mobile device charger Universal Black AC Fast charging Indoor (4 vs 2). The CLUB3D CAC-1933 4-Port USB-C® Charging Station has 2 more simultaneously connected devices (max) than the InLine 31590 mobile device charger Universal Black AC Fast charging Indoor (4 vs 2). The CLUB3D CAC-1933 4-Port USB-C® Charging Station has 84 mm more width than the InLine 31590 mobile device charger Universal Black AC Fast charging Indoor (122 mm vs 38 mm). Fast charging technology: GaN on the CLUB3D CAC-1933 4-Port USB-C® Charging Station, Power Delivery on the InLine 31590 mobile device charger Universal Black AC Fast charging Indoor. Package type: Box on the CLUB3D CAC-1933 4-Port USB-C® Charging Station, Hanging box on the InLine 31590 mobile device charger Universal Black AC Fast charging Indoor.

  • USB Type-C ports quantity
    • CAC-1933 4-Port USB-C® Charging Station:4
    • 31590 mobile device charger Universal Black AC Fast charging Indoor:2
  • Fast charging technology
    • CAC-1933 4-Port USB-C® Charging Station:GaN
    • 31590 mobile device charger Universal Black AC Fast charging Indoor:Power Delivery
  • Number of simultaneously connected devices (max)
    • CAC-1933 4-Port USB-C® Charging Station:4
    • 31590 mobile device charger Universal Black AC Fast charging Indoor:2
  • Width
    • CAC-1933 4-Port USB-C® Charging Station:122 mm
    • 31590 mobile device charger Universal Black AC Fast charging Indoor:38 mm
  • Depth
    • CAC-1933 4-Port USB-C® Charging Station:88 mm
    • 31590 mobile device charger Universal Black AC Fast charging Indoor:82 mm
  • Height
    • CAC-1933 4-Port USB-C® Charging Station:38 mm
    • 31590 mobile device charger Universal Black AC Fast charging Indoor:16 mm
  • Weight
    • CAC-1933 4-Port USB-C® Charging Station:667 g
    • 31590 mobile device charger Universal Black AC Fast charging Indoor:38 g
  • Package width
    • CAC-1933 4-Port USB-C® Charging Station:175 mm
    • 31590 mobile device charger Universal Black AC Fast charging Indoor:85 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of CAC-1933, 31590
53 specifications
Performance3 differ
Charger typeIndoorIndoor
Charger compatibilityUniversalUniversal
Power source typeACAC
USB Type-C ports quantityDiffers42
Wireless chargingNoNo
Fast chargingYesYes
Fast charging technologyDiffersGaNPower Delivery
Number of simultaneously connected devices (max)Differs42
Programmable power supply (PPS)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
USB Power Delivery (USB PD)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
USB Power Delivery up toKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 W
Power protection featuresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceOver voltage, Over current, Short circuit, Overheating
MagSafe compatibleKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Product colourBlackBlack
Gallium nitride (GaN) transistorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Cable lengthKnown for one1.8 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100 - 240 V
Input frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50/60 Hz
Input currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.8 A
Maximum powerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 W
Maximum output voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 V
Minimum output voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 V
Port 1 output powerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 W
Port 2 output powerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 W
Output current (5V)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3 A
Output current (9V)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3 A
Output current (12V)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.5 A
Output current (15V)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 A
Output current (20V)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.5 A
Port 1 output currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3 A
Port 2 output currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3 A
Average active efficiencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source84.77
Efficiency at low load (10%)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Efficiency (@10 %)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source80.2%
Power plug typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceType C
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers122 mm38 mm
DepthDiffers88 mm82 mm
HeightDiffers38 mm16 mm
WeightDiffers667 g38 g
Packaging data5 differ
Package widthDiffers175 mm85 mm
Package depthDiffers175 mm130 mm
Package heightDiffers60 mm30 mm
Package volumeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source400 cm³
Package weightDiffers70 g67 g
Package typeDiffersBoxHanging box
Logistics dataidentical
Country of originKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceChina
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one8504 4095Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source38 x 82 x 16 mm
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one1 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging compositionidentical
Paper/cardboard packaging weightKnown for one59 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Plastic packaging weightKnown for one3 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Total paper/cardboard packaging weightKnown for one0 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Total plastic packaging weightKnown for one0 gUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile device charger comparisons

All mobile device charger comparisons