Product comparison · 2 mobile device chargers

CLUB3D CAC-1933 4-Port USB-C® Charging Station vs i-tec 65W USB-C GaN Charger

14specifications compared
6differ
8identical
26known for one product only

Key differences

The CLUB3D CAC-1933 4-Port USB-C® Charging Station has 3 more USB Type-C ports quantity than the i-tec 65W USB-C GaN Charger (4 vs 1). The CLUB3D CAC-1933 4-Port USB-C® Charging Station has 3 more simultaneously connected devices (max) than the i-tec 65W USB-C GaN Charger (4 vs 1). The CLUB3D CAC-1933 4-Port USB-C® Charging Station has 68.6 mm more width than the i-tec 65W USB-C GaN Charger (122 mm vs 53.4 mm).

USB Type-C ports quantity
- CAC-1933 4-Port USB-C® Charging Station:4
- 65W USB-C GaN Charger:1
Number of simultaneously connected devices (max)
- CAC-1933 4-Port USB-C® Charging Station:4
- 65W USB-C GaN Charger:1
Width
- CAC-1933 4-Port USB-C® Charging Station:122 mm
- 65W USB-C GaN Charger:53.4 mm
Depth
- CAC-1933 4-Port USB-C® Charging Station:88 mm
- 65W USB-C GaN Charger:43.3 mm
Height
- CAC-1933 4-Port USB-C® Charging Station:38 mm
- 65W USB-C GaN Charger:32 mm
Weight
- CAC-1933 4-Port USB-C® Charging Station:667 g
- 65W USB-C GaN Charger:92 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CAC-1933, CHARGER-GAN65W
40 specifications	A CLUB3D CAC-1933 4-Port USB-C® Charging Station Model CAC-1933 View product	B i-tec 65W USB-C GaN Charger Model CHARGER-GAN65W View product
Performance2 differ
USB Type-C ports quantityDiffers	4	1
Number of simultaneously connected devices (max)Differs	4	1
USB Power Delivery (USB PD)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
USB Power Delivery up toKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	65 W
MagSafe compatibleKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Cable lengthKnown for one	1.8 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	110–240
Input frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50/60 Hz
Input currentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.5 A
Maximum powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	65 W
Output current (5V)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3 A
Output current (9V)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3 A
Output current (12V)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3 A
Output current (15V)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3 A
Output current (20V)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.25 A
Efficiency (@10 %)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	88%
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	122 mm	53.4 mm
DepthDiffers	88 mm	43.3 mm
HeightDiffers	38 mm	32 mm
WeightDiffers	667 g	92 g
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 30 °C
Packaging contentidentical
ManualKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	175 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	175 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	60 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	70 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package typeKnown for one	Box	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging compositionidentical
Paper/cardboard packaging weightKnown for one	59 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Plastic packaging weightKnown for one	3 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Total paper/cardboard packaging weightKnown for one	0 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Total plastic packaging weightKnown for one	0 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	8504 4095	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile device charger comparisons

All mobile device charger comparisons