Product comparison · 2 mobile device chargers

Celly Twin 4 vs Samsung ETA-U90EBEP Tablet Black AC Indoor

5specifications compared
3differ
2identical
5known for one product only

Key differences

Charger type
- Twin 4:Auto
- ETA-U90EBEP Tablet Black AC Indoor:Indoor
Power source type
- Twin 4:Cigar lighter
- ETA-U90EBEP Tablet Black AC Indoor:AC

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Twin 4, ETA-U90EBEP
10 specifications	A Celly Twin 4 View product	B Samsung ETA-U90EBEP Tablet Black AC Indoor Model ETA-U90EBEP View product
Performance3 differ
Charger typeDiffers	Auto	Indoor
Charger compatibilityDiffers	Gaming controls, GPS, Mobile phone, MP3, MP4, PDA	Tablet
Power source typeDiffers	Cigar lighter	AC
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Product colour	Black	Black
Poweridentical
Input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 - 240 V
Maximum output voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 V
AC adapter output currentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2 A
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	33 g
Other featuresidentical
Built-in battery	No	No

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile device charger comparisons

All mobile device charger comparisons