Product comparison · 2 mobile device chargers

Celly CCUSB mobile device charger Universal Black Cigar lighter Auto vs Philips DLV2201/27 mobile device charger Universal Black Cigar lighter Auto

Add a product
  • 6specifications compared
  • 1differ
  • 5identical
  • 13known for one product only

Key differences

  • Input voltage
    • CCUSB mobile device charger Universal Black Cigar lighter Auto:12/24 V
    • DLV2201/27 mobile device charger Universal Black Cigar lighter Auto:10.5 - 18 V

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of CCUSB, DLV2201/27
19 specifications
Performanceidentical
Charger typeAutoAuto
Charger compatibilityUniversalUniversal
Power source typeCigar lighterCigar lighter
USB 2.0 ports quantity11
Operating principleKnown for oneContactUnknown — not stated by the source
Basic device typeKnown for oneMobile phoneUnknown — not stated by the source
CompatibilityKnown for oneiPhone 5SUnknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Product colourBlackBlack
Power1 differ
Input voltageDiffers12/24 V10.5 - 18 V
Input currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.6 A
Maximum output voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 V
Output currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1000 mA
AC adapter output currentKnown for one1 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source36 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source96 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source37 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source135 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source76 g
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one1 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile device charger comparisons

All mobile device charger comparisons