Product comparison · 2 mobile device chargers

Cellularline CHARGER TFT 45W USB-C DEDICATED APPLE vs Tech Away GAN+ PD 65W CHARGER DUAL USB-A + USB-C PORT

Add a product
  • 26specifications compared
  • 12differ
  • 14identical
  • 7known for one product only

Key differences

The Tech Away GAN+ PD 65W CHARGER DUAL USB-A + USB-C PORT has 1 more simultaneously connected devices (max) than the Cellularline CHARGER TFT 45W USB-C DEDICATED APPLE (2 vs 1). The Tech Away GAN+ PD 65W CHARGER DUAL USB-A + USB-C PORT has 20 W more USB Power Delivery up to than the Cellularline CHARGER TFT 45W USB-C DEDICATED APPLE (65 W vs 45 W). The Tech Away GAN+ PD 65W CHARGER DUAL USB-A + USB-C PORT has 20 W more port 1 output power than the Cellularline CHARGER TFT 45W USB-C DEDICATED APPLE (65 W vs 45 W). Charger compatibility: Laptop, Universal, Smartphone on the Cellularline CHARGER TFT 45W USB-C DEDICATED APPLE, Laptop, Universal on the Tech Away GAN+ PD 65W CHARGER DUAL USB-A + USB-C PORT. Brand compatibility: Apple on the Cellularline CHARGER TFT 45W USB-C DEDICATED APPLE, Universal on the Tech Away GAN+ PD 65W CHARGER DUAL USB-A + USB-C PORT.

  • Number of simultaneously connected devices (max)
    • CHARGER TFT 45W USB-C DEDICATED APPLE:1
    • GAN+ PD 65W CHARGER DUAL USB-A + USB-C PORT:2
  • USB Power Delivery up to
    • CHARGER TFT 45W USB-C DEDICATED APPLE:45 W
    • GAN+ PD 65W CHARGER DUAL USB-A + USB-C PORT:65 W
  • Brand compatibility
    • CHARGER TFT 45W USB-C DEDICATED APPLE:Apple
    • GAN+ PD 65W CHARGER DUAL USB-A + USB-C PORT:Universal
  • Port 1 output power
    • CHARGER TFT 45W USB-C DEDICATED APPLE:45 W
    • GAN+ PD 65W CHARGER DUAL USB-A + USB-C PORT:65 W
  • Width
    • CHARGER TFT 45W USB-C DEDICATED APPLE:35 mm
    • GAN+ PD 65W CHARGER DUAL USB-A + USB-C PORT:53 mm
  • Depth
    • CHARGER TFT 45W USB-C DEDICATED APPLE:76 mm
    • GAN+ PD 65W CHARGER DUAL USB-A + USB-C PORT:30 mm
  • Height
    • CHARGER TFT 45W USB-C DEDICATED APPLE:33 mm
    • GAN+ PD 65W CHARGER DUAL USB-A + USB-C PORT:93 mm
  • Package width
    • CHARGER TFT 45W USB-C DEDICATED APPLE:90 mm
    • GAN+ PD 65W CHARGER DUAL USB-A + USB-C PORT:58 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of ACHIPHTFTUSBC45WW, TAONACH2USBPD65WW
33 specifications
A

Cellularline

CHARGER TFT 45W USB-C DEDICATED APPLE

Model ACHIPHTFTUSBC45WW

View product
Performance4 differ
Charger typeIndoorIndoor
Charger compatibilityDiffersLaptop, Universal, SmartphoneLaptop, Universal
Power source typeACAC
USB Type-C ports quantity11
Wireless chargingNoNo
Fast chargingYesYes
Fast charging technologyPower DeliveryPower Delivery
Number of simultaneously connected devices (max)Differs12
BluetoothNoNo
USB Power Delivery (USB PD)YesYes
USB Power Delivery up toDiffers45 W65 W
Brand compatibilityDiffersAppleUniversal
USB Type-A ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Designidentical
Product colourWhiteWhite
LED indicatorsNoNo
Gallium nitride (GaN) transistorsYesYes
Power1 differ
Maximum powerKnown for one45 WUnknown — not stated by the source
AC adapter powerKnown for one45 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Port 1 output powerDiffers45 W65 W
Port 2 output powerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source18 W
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers35 mm53 mm
DepthDiffers76 mm30 mm
HeightDiffers33 mm93 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source114 g
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers90 mm58 mm
Package depthDiffers40 mm35 mm
Package heightDiffers140 mm96 mm
Package weightDiffers85 g123 g
Packaging contentidentical
AC adapter includedNoNo
Technical detailsidentical
Radio Equipment Directive (RED)NoNo
Logistics dataidentical
Warranty periodKnown for one2 year(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Built-in displayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Batteries includedNoNo

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile device charger comparisons

All mobile device charger comparisons