Product comparison · 2 mobile device chargers

Cellularline CHARGER KIT MULTIPORT GAN+ vs iggual IGG320990 mobile device charger Laptop White AC Fast charging Indoor

13specifications compared
8differ
5identical
36known for one product only

Key differences

The Cellularline CHARGER KIT MULTIPORT GAN+ has 1 more simultaneously connected devices (max) than the iggual IGG320990 mobile device charger Laptop White AC Fast charging Indoor (2 vs 1). The Cellularline CHARGER KIT MULTIPORT GAN+ has 0.2 m more cable length than the iggual IGG320990 mobile device charger Laptop White AC Fast charging Indoor (2 m vs 1.8 m). The iggual IGG320990 mobile device charger Laptop White AC Fast charging Indoor has 110 W more maximum power than the Cellularline CHARGER KIT MULTIPORT GAN+ (140 W vs 30 W). Charger compatibility: Smartphone, Universal on the Cellularline CHARGER KIT MULTIPORT GAN+, Laptop on the iggual IGG320990 mobile device charger Laptop White AC Fast charging Indoor. Fast charging technology: Power Delivery, Quick Charge on the Cellularline CHARGER KIT MULTIPORT GAN+, Power Delivery on the iggual IGG320990 mobile device charger Laptop White AC Fast charging Indoor.

Charger compatibility
- CHARGER KIT MULTIPORT GAN+:Smartphone, Universal
- IGG320990 mobile device charger Laptop White AC Fast charging Indoor:Laptop
Fast charging technology
- CHARGER KIT MULTIPORT GAN+:Power Delivery, Quick Charge
- IGG320990 mobile device charger Laptop White AC Fast charging Indoor:Power Delivery
Number of simultaneously connected devices (max)
- CHARGER KIT MULTIPORT GAN+:2
- IGG320990 mobile device charger Laptop White AC Fast charging Indoor:1
Cable length
- CHARGER KIT MULTIPORT GAN+:2 m
- IGG320990 mobile device charger Laptop White AC Fast charging Indoor:1.8 m
Maximum power
- CHARGER KIT MULTIPORT GAN+:30 W
- IGG320990 mobile device charger Laptop White AC Fast charging Indoor:140 W
Width
- CHARGER KIT MULTIPORT GAN+:30.5 mm
- IGG320990 mobile device charger Laptop White AC Fast charging Indoor:71 mm
Depth
- CHARGER KIT MULTIPORT GAN+:75 mm
- IGG320990 mobile device charger Laptop White AC Fast charging Indoor:71 mm
Height
- CHARGER KIT MULTIPORT GAN+:31.5 mm
- IGG320990 mobile device charger Laptop White AC Fast charging Indoor:29 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of ACHGANENTKIT30TABW, IGG320990
49 specifications	A Cellularline CHARGER KIT MULTIPORT GAN+ Model ACHGANENTKIT30TABW View product	B iggual IGG320990 mobile device charger Laptop White AC Fast charging Indoor Model IGG320990 View product
Performance3 differ
Charger type	Indoor	Indoor
Charger compatibilityDiffers	Smartphone, Universal	Laptop
Power source type	AC	AC
USB Type-A ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB Type-C ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Wireless charging	No	No
Fast charging	Yes	Yes
Fast charging technologyDiffers	Power Delivery, Quick Charge	Power Delivery
Number of simultaneously connected devices (max)Differs	2	1
BluetoothKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB Power Delivery (USB PD)Known for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB Power Delivery up toKnown for one	30 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Brand compatibilityKnown for one	Universal	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power protection featuresKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Over current, Over voltage, Short circuit
CompatibilityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Apple Macbook
Design1 differ
Product colour	White	White
Cable lengthDiffers	2 m	1.8 m
LED indicatorsKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Gallium nitride (GaN) transistorsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Housing materialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Thermoplastic elastomer (TPE)
Power1 differ
Maximum powerDiffers	30 W	140 W
AC adapter powerKnown for one	30 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Port 1 output powerKnown for one	30 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Port 2 output powerKnown for one	18 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 - 240 V
Input frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50/60 Hz
Input currentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.8 A
Maximum output voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	28 V
Minimum output voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 V
AC adapter output currentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 A
Output current (5V)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3 A
Output current (9V)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3 A
Output current (12V)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3 A
Output current (15V)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 A
Output current (20V)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 A
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	30.5 mm	71 mm
DepthDiffers	75 mm	71 mm
HeightDiffers	31.5 mm	29 mm
WeightKnown for one	124 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	90 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	35 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	165 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	145 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one	1 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC adapter includedKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cables includedKnown for one	USB Type-C to USB Type-C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Radio Equipment Directive (RED)Known for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Batteries includedKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CE, RoHS

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile device charger comparisons

All mobile device charger comparisons