Product comparison · 2 mobile device chargers

Cellularline GaN+ 65W USB-C charger with integrated cable vs Hama 00201942 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset White AC Fast charging Indoor

Add a product
  • 11specifications compared
  • 3differ
  • 8identical
  • 27known for one product only

Key differences

The Hama 00201942 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset White AC Fast charging Indoor has 35 W more USB Power Delivery up to than the Cellularline GaN+ 65W USB-C charger with integrated cable (100 W vs 65 W). The Hama 00201942 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset White AC Fast charging Indoor has 35 W more maximum power than the Cellularline GaN+ 65W USB-C charger with integrated cable (100 W vs 65 W).

  • USB Power Delivery up to
    • GaN+ 65W USB-C charger with integrated cable:65 W
    • 00201942 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset White AC Fast charging Indoor:100 W
  • Maximum power
    • GaN+ 65W USB-C charger with integrated cable:65 W
    • 00201942 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset White AC Fast charging Indoor:100 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of ACHADPGAN65WLAPK, 00201942
38 specifications
Performance2 differ
Charger compatibilityDiffersLaptop, UniversalSmartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Power bank, Headset
USB Type-C ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Fast charging technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePower Delivery 3.0, Quick Charge 2.0, Quick Charge 3.0
USB Power Delivery revisionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.0
USB Power Delivery up toDiffers65 W100 W
Power protection featuresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceOver current, Overload, Short circuit
Brand compatibilityKnown for oneUniversalUnknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Cable lengthKnown for one2 mUnknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source220 - 240 V
Input frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50/60 Hz
Maximum powerDiffers65 W100 W
Output current (5V)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3 A
Output current (9V)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3 A
Output current (15V)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3 A
Output current (20V)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 A
Average active efficiencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source81.4
Efficiency at low load (10%)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Efficiency (@10 %)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source74.7%
Power plug typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceType C
AC adapter output currentKnown for one5 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
ManualKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
AC adapter includedKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one60 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one110 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one18 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package weightKnown for one259 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Radio Equipment Directive (RED)Known for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Batteries includedKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile device charger comparisons

All mobile device charger comparisons