Product comparison · 2 mobile device chargers

Cellularline GaN+ 65W USB-C charger with integrated cable vs Hama 00201941 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet White AC Fast charging Indoor

Add a product
  • 14specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 8identical
  • 16known for one product only

Key differences

The Cellularline GaN+ 65W USB-C charger with integrated cable has 5 W more USB Power Delivery up to than the Hama 00201941 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet White AC Fast charging Indoor (65 W vs 60 W). The Cellularline GaN+ 65W USB-C charger with integrated cable has 5 W more maximum power than the Hama 00201941 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet White AC Fast charging Indoor (65 W vs 60 W). The Cellularline GaN+ 65W USB-C charger with integrated cable has 29 mm more width than the Hama 00201941 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet White AC Fast charging Indoor (60 mm vs 31 mm). Charger compatibility: Laptop, Universal on the Cellularline GaN+ 65W USB-C charger with integrated cable, Smartphone, Tablet on the Hama 00201941 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet White AC Fast charging Indoor.

  • Charger compatibility
    • GaN+ 65W USB-C charger with integrated cable:Laptop, Universal
    • 00201941 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet White AC Fast charging Indoor:Smartphone, Tablet
  • USB Power Delivery up to
    • GaN+ 65W USB-C charger with integrated cable:65 W
    • 00201941 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet White AC Fast charging Indoor:60 W
  • Maximum power
    • GaN+ 65W USB-C charger with integrated cable:65 W
    • 00201941 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet White AC Fast charging Indoor:60 W
  • Width
    • GaN+ 65W USB-C charger with integrated cable:60 mm
    • 00201941 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet White AC Fast charging Indoor:31 mm
  • Depth
    • GaN+ 65W USB-C charger with integrated cable:110 mm
    • 00201941 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet White AC Fast charging Indoor:48 mm
  • Height
    • GaN+ 65W USB-C charger with integrated cable:18 mm
    • 00201941 mobile device charger Smartphone, Tablet White AC Fast charging Indoor:36 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of ACHADPGAN65WLAPK, 00201941
30 specifications
Performance2 differ
Charger compatibilityDiffersLaptop, UniversalSmartphone, Tablet
USB Power Delivery up toDiffers65 W60 W
Brand compatibilityKnown for oneUniversalUnknown — not stated by the source
USB Type-C ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Fast charging technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceQuick Charge 3+, Quick Charge 2.0, Quick Charge 3.0, Power Delivery 3.2
USB Power Delivery revisionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.2
Power protection featuresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceOverload, Short circuit, Over current
Designidentical
Cable lengthKnown for one2 mUnknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Maximum powerDiffers65 W60 W
AC adapter output currentKnown for one5 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100 - 240 V
Power plug typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceType C
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers60 mm31 mm
DepthDiffers110 mm48 mm
HeightDiffers18 mm36 mm
Packaging dataidentical
Package weightKnown for one259 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
AC adapter includedKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
ManualKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Technical detailsidentical
Radio Equipment Directive (RED)Known for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Batteries includedKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile device charger comparisons

All mobile device charger comparisons