Product comparison · 2 mobile device chargers

Cellularline GaN+ 100W USB-C charger with integrated cable vs CLUB3D Leeuwen lader USB‑C® 30Watt

Add a product
  • 12specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 6identical
  • 24known for one product only

Key differences

The Cellularline GaN+ 100W USB-C charger with integrated cable has 70 W more maximum power than the CLUB3D Leeuwen lader USB‑C® 30Watt (100 W vs 30 W). The Cellularline GaN+ 100W USB-C charger with integrated cable has 59.5 mm more width than the CLUB3D Leeuwen lader USB‑C® 30Watt (110 mm vs 50.5 mm). The Cellularline GaN+ 100W USB-C charger with integrated cable has 37 mm more depth than the CLUB3D Leeuwen lader USB‑C® 30Watt (60 mm vs 23 mm). Product colour: White on the Cellularline GaN+ 100W USB-C charger with integrated cable, Orange, Multicolour on the CLUB3D Leeuwen lader USB‑C® 30Watt.

  • Product colour
    • GaN+ 100W USB-C charger with integrated cable:White
    • Leeuwen lader USB‑C® 30Watt:Orange, Multicolour
  • Maximum power
    • GaN+ 100W USB-C charger with integrated cable:100 W
    • Leeuwen lader USB‑C® 30Watt:30 W
  • Width
    • GaN+ 100W USB-C charger with integrated cable:110 mm
    • Leeuwen lader USB‑C® 30Watt:50.5 mm
  • Depth
    • GaN+ 100W USB-C charger with integrated cable:60 mm
    • Leeuwen lader USB‑C® 30Watt:23 mm
  • Height
    • GaN+ 100W USB-C charger with integrated cable:18 mm
    • Leeuwen lader USB‑C® 30Watt:39.8 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of ACHADPGAN100WLAPK, CAC-3028
36 specifications
Performance1 differ
Charger typeIndoorIndoor
Charger compatibilityDiffersLaptop, UniversalMobile phone, Smartphone, Tablet, Portable speaker, Power bank
Power source typeACAC
Wireless chargingNoNo
Fast chargingYesYes
Number of simultaneously connected devices (max)11
USB Power Delivery (USB PD)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
USB Power Delivery up toKnown for one100 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Brand compatibilityKnown for oneUniversalUnknown — not stated by the source
USB Type-C ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Fast charging technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePower Delivery 3.0
MagSafe compatibleKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffersWhiteOrange, Multicolour
Cable lengthKnown for one2 mUnknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Gallium nitride (GaN) transistorsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Maximum powerDiffers100 W30 W
AC adapter output currentKnown for one5 AUnknown — not stated by the source
AC adapter powerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 W
Port 1 output powerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 W
Power plug typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceType C
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers110 mm50.5 mm
DepthDiffers60 mm23 mm
HeightDiffers18 mm39.8 mm
WeightKnown for one348 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one135 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one180 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one32 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one380 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Package typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePolybag
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per pack1 pc(s)1 pc(s)
AC adapter includedKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Cables includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Included power plug typesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceEU
Technical detailsidentical
Radio Equipment Directive (RED)Known for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Batteries includedKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mobile device charger comparisons

All mobile device charger comparisons