Product comparison · 2 microphones

Biamp MICPAT-2 Selective 2-Zone Paging Station vs Konix Lur Evo

14specifications compared
11differ
3identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

The Biamp MICPAT-2 Selective 2-Zone Paging Station has 3.2 m more cable length than the Konix Lur Evo (5 m vs 1.8 m). The Konix Lur Evo has 27 mm more width than the Biamp MICPAT-2 Selective 2-Zone Paging Station (152 mm vs 125 mm). The Konix Lur Evo has 11 mm more depth than the Biamp MICPAT-2 Selective 2-Zone Paging Station (186 mm vs 175 mm). Type: Table microphone on the Biamp MICPAT-2 Selective 2-Zone Paging Station, PC microphone on the Konix Lur Evo. Microphone frequency: 80 - 12000 Hz on the Biamp MICPAT-2 Selective 2-Zone Paging Station, 20 - 20000 Hz on the Konix Lur Evo.

Type
- MICPAT-2 Selective 2-Zone Paging Station:Table microphone
- Lur Evo:PC microphone
Microphone frequency
- MICPAT-2 Selective 2-Zone Paging Station:80 - 12000 Hz
- Lur Evo:20 - 20000 Hz
Cable length
- MICPAT-2 Selective 2-Zone Paging Station:5 m
- Lur Evo:1.8 m
Width
- MICPAT-2 Selective 2-Zone Paging Station:125 mm
- Lur Evo:152 mm
Depth
- MICPAT-2 Selective 2-Zone Paging Station:175 mm
- Lur Evo:186 mm
Height
- MICPAT-2 Selective 2-Zone Paging Station:55 mm
- Lur Evo:66 mm
Microphone weight
- MICPAT-2 Selective 2-Zone Paging Station:920 g
- Lur Evo:510 g
Package width
- MICPAT-2 Selective 2-Zone Paging Station:184.9 mm
- Lur Evo:152 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of MICPAT-2, Lur Evo
35 specifications	A Biamp MICPAT-2 Selective 2-Zone Paging Station Model MICPAT-2 View product	B Konix Lur Evo View product
Microphone2 differ
TypeDiffers	Table microphone	PC microphone
Microphone sensitivityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-34 dB
Microphone frequencyDiffers	80 - 12000 Hz	20 - 20000 Hz
Microphone input impedanceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	32 Ω
Microphone holderKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Microphone muteKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Volume controlKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Buttons
Recommended load impedanceKnown for one	600 Ω	Unknown — not stated by the source
Output configurationKnown for one	Balanced	Unknown — not stated by the source
Microphone direction typeKnown for one	Unidirectional	Unknown — not stated by the source
Voice coil typeKnown for one	Dynamic	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Connectivity technology	Wired	Wired
Device interfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB
Microphone inKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Performance1 differ
Product colour	Black	Black
Control type	Buttons	Buttons
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Cable lengthDiffers	5 m	1.8 m
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Windows 8, Windows 10
Housing materialKnown for one	Aluminium	Unknown — not stated by the source
Country of originKnown for one	Taiwan	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power sourceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	125 mm	152 mm
DepthDiffers	175 mm	186 mm
HeightDiffers	55 mm	66 mm
Microphone weightDiffers	920 g	510 g
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	184.9 mm	152 mm
Package depthDiffers	270 mm	186 mm
Package heightDiffers	130 mm	66 mm
Package typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Box
Package weightDiffers	1.3 kg	510 g
Packaging contentidentical
Number of products includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 pc(s)
Desktop standKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Logistics dataidentical
Export Control Classification Number (ECCN)Known for one	EAR99	Unknown — not stated by the source
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	8517620050	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More microphone comparisons

All microphone comparisons