Product comparison · 2 microphones

Biamp MICPAT-2 Selective 2-Zone Paging Station vs Biamp MICPAT-2 Selective 4-Zone Paging Station

Add a product
  • 18specifications compared
  • 12differ
  • 6identical
  • 5known for one product only

Key differences

The Biamp MICPAT-2 Selective 2-Zone Paging Station has 550 Ω more recommended load impedance than the Biamp MICPAT-2 Selective 4-Zone Paging Station (600 Ω vs 50 Ω). The Biamp MICPAT-2 Selective 2-Zone Paging Station has 10 mm more width than the Biamp MICPAT-2 Selective 4-Zone Paging Station (125 mm vs 115 mm). The Biamp MICPAT-2 Selective 2-Zone Paging Station has 13 mm more depth than the Biamp MICPAT-2 Selective 4-Zone Paging Station (175 mm vs 162 mm). Voice coil type: Dynamic on the Biamp MICPAT-2 Selective 2-Zone Paging Station, Condenser on the Biamp MICPAT-2 Selective 4-Zone Paging Station. Product colour: Black on the Biamp MICPAT-2 Selective 2-Zone Paging Station, Grey on the Biamp MICPAT-2 Selective 4-Zone Paging Station.

  • Recommended load impedance
    • MICPAT-2 Selective 2-Zone Paging Station:600 Ω
    • MICPAT-2 Selective 4-Zone Paging Station:50 Ω
  • Voice coil type
    • MICPAT-2 Selective 2-Zone Paging Station:Dynamic
    • MICPAT-2 Selective 4-Zone Paging Station:Condenser
  • Product colour
    • MICPAT-2 Selective 2-Zone Paging Station:Black
    • MICPAT-2 Selective 4-Zone Paging Station:Grey
  • Country of origin
    • MICPAT-2 Selective 2-Zone Paging Station:Taiwan
    • MICPAT-2 Selective 4-Zone Paging Station:China
  • Width
    • MICPAT-2 Selective 2-Zone Paging Station:125 mm
    • MICPAT-2 Selective 4-Zone Paging Station:115 mm
  • Depth
    • MICPAT-2 Selective 2-Zone Paging Station:175 mm
    • MICPAT-2 Selective 4-Zone Paging Station:162 mm
  • Microphone weight
    • MICPAT-2 Selective 2-Zone Paging Station:920 g
    • MICPAT-2 Selective 4-Zone Paging Station:700 g
  • Package width
    • MICPAT-2 Selective 2-Zone Paging Station:184.9 mm
    • MICPAT-2 Selective 4-Zone Paging Station:169.9 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of MICPAT-2, MICPAT-4
23 specifications
Microphone2 differ
Recommended load impedanceDiffers600 Ω50 Ω
Microphone direction typeKnown for oneUnidirectionalUnknown — not stated by the source
Voice coil typeDiffersDynamicCondenser
Ports & interfacesidentical
Device interfaceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRJ-45
Performance2 differ
Product colourDiffersBlackGrey
Housing materialKnown for oneAluminiumUnknown — not stated by the source
Country of originDiffersTaiwanChina
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers125 mm115 mm
DepthDiffers175 mm162 mm
HeightKnown for one55 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Microphone weightDiffers920 g700 g
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers184.9 mm169.9 mm
Package depthDiffers270 mm190 mm
Package heightDiffers130 mm134.9 mm
Package weightDiffers1.3 kg850 g
Logistics data1 differ
Export Control Classification Number (ECCN)Known for oneEAR99Unknown — not stated by the source
Harmonized System (HS) codeDiffers85176200508518109500

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More microphone comparisons

All microphone comparisons