Biamp BMA 360D vs Cherry UM 3.0

Key differences

The Biamp BMA 360D has 442 mm more width than the Cherry UM 3.0 (602 mm vs 160 mm). The Cherry UM 3.0 has 86.7 mm more depth than the Biamp BMA 360D (140 mm vs 53.3 mm). The Biamp BMA 360D has 339 mm more height than the Cherry UM 3.0 (602 mm vs 263 mm). Type: Conference microphone on the Biamp BMA 360D, Table microphone on the Cherry UM 3.0. Device interface: RJ-45 on the Biamp BMA 360D, USB on the Cherry UM 3.0.

• Type
  • BMA 360D:Conference microphone
  • UM 3.0:Table microphone
• Device interface
  • BMA 360D:RJ-45
  • UM 3.0:USB
• Product colour
  • BMA 360D:White
  • UM 3.0:Black
• Power source
  • BMA 360D:PoE
  • UM 3.0:USB
• Width
  • BMA 360D:602 mm
  • UM 3.0:160 mm
• Depth
  • BMA 360D:53.3 mm
  • UM 3.0:140 mm
• Height
  • BMA 360D:602 mm
  • UM 3.0:263 mm
• Microphone weight
  • BMA 360D:5 kg
  • UM 3.0:497 g