Product comparison · 2 mice

TooQ TQM-1001-B mouse Universal Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical 1000 DPI vs TooQ TQMWG-1105-B mouse Universal Right-hand RF Wireless Optical 1600 DPI

26specifications compared
12differ
14identical
12known for one product only

Key differences

Connectivity technology
- TQM-1001-B mouse Universal Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical 1000 DPI:Wired
- TQMWG-1105-B mouse Universal Right-hand RF Wireless Optical 1600 DPI:Wireless
Device interface
- TQM-1001-B mouse Universal Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical 1000 DPI:USB Type-A
- TQMWG-1105-B mouse Universal Right-hand RF Wireless Optical 1600 DPI:RF Wireless
Movement resolution
- TQM-1001-B mouse Universal Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical 1000 DPI:1000 DPI
- TQMWG-1105-B mouse Universal Right-hand RF Wireless Optical 1600 DPI:1600 DPI
Form factor
- TQM-1001-B mouse Universal Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical 1000 DPI:Ambidextrous
- TQMWG-1105-B mouse Universal Right-hand RF Wireless Optical 1600 DPI:Right-hand
Power source
- TQM-1001-B mouse Universal Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical 1000 DPI:Cable
- TQMWG-1105-B mouse Universal Right-hand RF Wireless Optical 1600 DPI:Batteries
Width
- TQM-1001-B mouse Universal Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical 1000 DPI:60 mm
- TQMWG-1105-B mouse Universal Right-hand RF Wireless Optical 1600 DPI:80 mm
Depth
- TQM-1001-B mouse Universal Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical 1000 DPI:120 mm
- TQMWG-1105-B mouse Universal Right-hand RF Wireless Optical 1600 DPI:110 mm
Height
- TQM-1001-B mouse Universal Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical 1000 DPI:38 mm
- TQMWG-1105-B mouse Universal Right-hand RF Wireless Optical 1600 DPI:46 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of TQM-1001-B, TQMWG-1105-B
38 specifications	A TooQ TQM-1001-B mouse Universal Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical 1000 DPI Model TQM-1001-B View product	B TooQ TQMWG-1105-B mouse Universal Right-hand RF Wireless Optical 1600 DPI Model TQMWG-1105-B View product
Mouse3 differ
Purpose	Universal	Universal
Connectivity technologyDiffers	Wired	Wireless
Device interfaceDiffers	USB Type-A	RF Wireless
Movement detection technology	Optical	Optical
Movement resolutionDiffers	1000 DPI	1600 DPI
Scroll type	Wheel	Wheel
Number of scroll wheels	1	1
Scrolling directions	Vertical	Vertical
Buttons quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	6
Customizable movement resolutionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Number of movement resolution modesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3
Frequency bandKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2.4 GHz
Design1 differ
Form factorDiffers	Ambidextrous	Right-hand
Product colour	Black	Black
Surface coloration	Monochromatic	Monochromatic
Ergonomicsidentical
Works on any surface	Yes	Yes
Wireless rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 m
Plug and Play	Yes	Yes
Cable lengthKnown for one	1.3 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power sourceDiffers	Cable	Batteries
Number of batteries supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Battery typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	AA
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supported	Yes	Yes
Mac operating systems supported	Yes	Yes
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	60 mm	80 mm
DepthDiffers	120 mm	110 mm
HeightDiffers	38 mm	46 mm
WeightDiffers	65 g	76 g
Packaging data3 differ
Quantity per pack	1 pc(s)	1 pc(s)
AC adapter included	No	No
Package widthDiffers	80 mm	83 mm
Package depthDiffers	150 mm	160 mm
Package height	45 mm	45 mm
Package weightDiffers	82 g	115 g
Packaging contentidentical
Receiver includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Wireless receiver interfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB Type-A
Batteries includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mouse comparisons

All mouse comparisons