Product comparison · 2 mice

Nilox NX-1000V mouse USB Type-A Optical 1600 DPI vs Targus AMW50US mouse RF Wireless Optical 800 DPI

Add a product
  • 5specifications compared
  • 3differ
  • 2identical
  • 12known for one product only

Key differences

  • Device interface
    • NX-1000V mouse USB Type-A Optical 1600 DPI:USB Type-A
    • AMW50US mouse RF Wireless Optical 800 DPI:RF Wireless
  • Movement resolution
    • NX-1000V mouse USB Type-A Optical 1600 DPI:1600 DPI
    • AMW50US mouse RF Wireless Optical 800 DPI:800 DPI
  • Buttons quantity
    • NX-1000V mouse USB Type-A Optical 1600 DPI:2
    • AMW50US mouse RF Wireless Optical 800 DPI:3

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of NX-1000V, AMW50US
17 specifications
Mouse3 differ
Device interfaceDiffersUSB Type-ARF Wireless
Movement resolutionDiffers1600 DPI800 DPI
Buttons quantityDiffers23
Frequency bandKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.4 GHz
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBlack
Ergonomicsidentical
Wireless rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 m
Plug and PlayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source108 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source57.1 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source38.1 mm
WeightKnown for one250 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneWindows Vista, Windows XP, Windows 2000, MACUnknown — not stated by the source
Mouse dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one120 x 70 x 65 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mouse comparisons

All mouse comparisons