Product comparison · 2 mice

Kensington Pro Fit Ergo TB675 vs Targus EcoSmart mouse Home Ambidextrous USB Type-A + USB Type-C 2400 DPI

Add a product
  • 13specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 7identical
  • 16known for one product only

Key differences

The Targus EcoSmart mouse Home Ambidextrous USB Type-A + USB Type-C 2400 DPI has 800 DPI more movement resolution than the Kensington Pro Fit Ergo TB675 (2400 DPI vs 1600 DPI). The Kensington Pro Fit Ergo TB675 has 6 more buttons quantity than the Targus EcoSmart mouse Home Ambidextrous USB Type-A + USB Type-C 2400 DPI (9 vs 3). Purpose: Office on the Kensington Pro Fit Ergo TB675, Home on the Targus EcoSmart mouse Home Ambidextrous USB Type-A + USB Type-C 2400 DPI. Device interface: USB Type-C on the Kensington Pro Fit Ergo TB675, USB Type-A + USB Type-C on the Targus EcoSmart mouse Home Ambidextrous USB Type-A + USB Type-C 2400 DPI. Scroll type: Trackball/Wheel on the Kensington Pro Fit Ergo TB675, Wheel on the Targus EcoSmart mouse Home Ambidextrous USB Type-A + USB Type-C 2400 DPI.

  • Purpose
    • Pro Fit Ergo TB675:Office
    • EcoSmart mouse Home Ambidextrous USB Type-A + USB Type-C 2400 DPI:Home
  • Device interface
    • Pro Fit Ergo TB675:USB Type-C
    • EcoSmart mouse Home Ambidextrous USB Type-A + USB Type-C 2400 DPI:USB Type-A + USB Type-C
  • Movement resolution
    • Pro Fit Ergo TB675:1600 DPI
    • EcoSmart mouse Home Ambidextrous USB Type-A + USB Type-C 2400 DPI:2400 DPI
  • Scroll type
    • Pro Fit Ergo TB675:Trackball/Wheel
    • EcoSmart mouse Home Ambidextrous USB Type-A + USB Type-C 2400 DPI:Wheel
  • Buttons quantity
    • Pro Fit Ergo TB675:9
    • EcoSmart mouse Home Ambidextrous USB Type-A + USB Type-C 2400 DPI:3
  • Form factor
    • Pro Fit Ergo TB675:Right-hand
    • EcoSmart mouse Home Ambidextrous USB Type-A + USB Type-C 2400 DPI:Ambidextrous

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of Pro Fit Ergo TB675, EcoSmart
29 specifications
Mouse5 differ
PurposeDiffersOfficeHome
Device interfaceDiffersUSB Type-CUSB Type-A + USB Type-C
Movement resolutionDiffers1600 DPI2400 DPI
Scroll typeDiffersTrackball/WheelWheel
Number of scroll wheelsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Buttons quantityDiffers93
Customizable movement resolutionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Number of movement resolution modesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3
Movement detection technologyKnown for oneOpticalUnknown — not stated by the source
Programmable mouse buttonsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of programmable buttonsKnown for one9Unknown — not stated by the source
Trackball diameterKnown for one3.4 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Form factorDiffersRight-handAmbidextrous
Vertical designKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Cable lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.52 m
Poweridentical
USB Type-C charging portKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source114.3 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source66.8 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source41.4 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source117.9 g
Packaging dataidentical
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Sustainabilityidentical
Product recycled contentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source85%

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mouse comparisons

All mouse comparisons