All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 mice

Kensington Pro Fit Ergo TB675 vs R-Go Tools RGOTWBMWLOR mouse Universal Ambidextrous Bluetooth + USB Type-C Optical 2400 DPI

Add a product
  • 15specifications compared
  • 9differ
  • 6identical
  • 28known for one product only

Key differences

The R-Go Tools RGOTWBMWLOR mouse Universal Ambidextrous Bluetooth + USB Type-C Optical 2400 DPI has 800 DPI more movement resolution than the Kensington Pro Fit Ergo TB675 (2400 DPI vs 1600 DPI). The Kensington Pro Fit Ergo TB675 has 6 more buttons quantity than the R-Go Tools RGOTWBMWLOR mouse Universal Ambidextrous Bluetooth + USB Type-C Optical 2400 DPI (9 vs 3). Only the R-Go Tools RGOTWBMWLOR mouse Universal Ambidextrous Bluetooth + USB Type-C Optical 2400 DPI has USB Type-C charging port. Purpose: Office on the Kensington Pro Fit Ergo TB675, Universal on the R-Go Tools RGOTWBMWLOR mouse Universal Ambidextrous Bluetooth + USB Type-C Optical 2400 DPI. Connectivity technology: Wired on the Kensington Pro Fit Ergo TB675, Wired & Wireless on the R-Go Tools RGOTWBMWLOR mouse Universal Ambidextrous Bluetooth + USB Type-C Optical 2400 DPI.

  • Purpose
    • Office
    • Universal
  • Connectivity technology
    • Wired
    • Wired & Wireless
  • Device interface
    • USB Type-C
    • Bluetooth + USB Type-C
  • Movement resolution
    • 1600 DPI
    • 2400 DPI
  • Scroll type
    • Trackball/Wheel
    • Wheel
  • Buttons quantity
    • 9
    • 3
  • Form factor
    • Right-hand
    • Ambidextrous
  • Power source
    • Cable
    • Batteries/Cable

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
43 specifications
A

Kensington

Pro Fit Ergo TB675View product
B

R-Go Tools

RGOTWBMWLOR mouse Universal Ambidextrous Bluetooth + USB Type-C Optical 2400 DPI

Model RGOTWBMWLOR

View product
Mouse6 differ
PurposeDiffersOfficeUniversal
Connectivity technologyDiffersWiredWired & Wireless
Device interfaceDiffersUSB Type-CBluetooth + USB Type-C
Movement detection technologyOpticalOptical
Movement resolutionDiffers1600 DPI2400 DPI
Scroll typeDiffersTrackball/WheelWheel
Number of scroll wheelsKnown for one1
Scrolling directionsVerticalVertical
Buttons quantityDiffers93
Buttons typeKnown for onePressed buttons
Customizable movement resolutionKnown for oneYes
Number of movement resolution modesKnown for one5
Bluetooth versionKnown for one5.2
Programmable mouse buttonsKnown for oneYes
Number of programmable buttonsKnown for one9
Trackball diameterKnown for one3.4 cm
Design1 differ
Form factorDiffersRight-handAmbidextrous
Product colourBlackBlack
MaterialKnown for onePlastic
LED indicatorsKnown for oneYes
Vertical designKnown for oneYes
Ergonomicsidentical
Cable lengthKnown for one1.55 m
Wireless rangeKnown for one10 m
Plug and PlayYesYes
Power2 differ
Power sourceDiffersCableBatteries/Cable
RechargeableKnown for oneYes
Battery typeKnown for oneBuilt-in battery
Battery recharge timeKnown for one2 h
USB Type-C charging portDiffersNoYes
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedYesYes
Mac operating systems supportedYesYes
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one98 mm
DepthKnown for one86 mm
HeightKnown for one72 mm
WeightKnown for one122 g
Packaging dataidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one1 pc(s)
Package widthKnown for one116 mm
Package depthKnown for one107 mm
Package heightKnown for one61 mm
Package weightKnown for one268 g
Batteryidentical
Battery capacityKnown for one230 mAh
Logistics dataidentical
Country of originKnown for oneChina
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for one14.2 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mouse comparisons

All mouse comparisons