All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 mice

iggual OFFICE-ESSENTIAL-4D 2400DPI vs R-Go Tools RGOWABMWLBL mouse Universal Ambidextrous RF Wireless + Bluetooth + USB Type-C Optical 800 DPI

Add a product
  • 23specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 10identical
  • 17known for one product only

Key differences

The iggual OFFICE-ESSENTIAL-4D 2400DPI has 1,600 DPI more movement resolution than the R-Go Tools RGOWABMWLBL mouse Universal Ambidextrous RF Wireless + Bluetooth + USB Type-C Optical 800 DPI (2400 DPI vs 800 DPI). The iggual OFFICE-ESSENTIAL-4D 2400DPI has 1 more buttons quantity than the R-Go Tools RGOWABMWLBL mouse Universal Ambidextrous RF Wireless + Bluetooth + USB Type-C Optical 800 DPI (4 vs 3). The iggual OFFICE-ESSENTIAL-4D 2400DPI has 0.7 m more cable length than the R-Go Tools RGOWABMWLBL mouse Universal Ambidextrous RF Wireless + Bluetooth + USB Type-C Optical 800 DPI (1.5 m vs 0.8 m). Only the R-Go Tools RGOWABMWLBL mouse Universal Ambidextrous RF Wireless + Bluetooth + USB Type-C Optical 800 DPI has USB Type-C charging port. Purpose: Office on the iggual OFFICE-ESSENTIAL-4D 2400DPI, Universal on the R-Go Tools RGOWABMWLBL mouse Universal Ambidextrous RF Wireless + Bluetooth + USB Type-C Optical 800 DPI.

  • Purpose
    • Office
    • Universal
  • Connectivity technology
    • Wired
    • Wired & Wireless
  • Movement resolution
    • 2400 DPI
    • 800 DPI
  • Buttons quantity
    • 4
    • 3
  • Product colour
    • Black
    • Black, Silver
  • Cable length
    • 1.5 m
    • 0.8 m
  • Power source
    • Cable
    • Batteries/Cable
  • USB Type-C charging port
    • No
    • Yes

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
40 specifications
A

iggual

OFFICE-ESSENTIAL-4D 2400DPIView product
B

R-Go Tools

RGOWABMWLBL mouse Universal Ambidextrous RF Wireless + Bluetooth + USB Type-C Optical 800 DPI

Model RGOWABMWLBL

View product
Mouse5 differ
PurposeDiffersOfficeUniversal
Connectivity technologyDiffersWiredWired & Wireless
Device interfaceDiffersUSB Type-ARF Wireless + Bluetooth + USB Type-C
Movement detection technologyOpticalOptical
Movement resolutionDiffers2400 DPI800 DPI
Scroll typeWheelWheel
Number of scroll wheels11
Scrolling directionsVerticalVertical
Buttons quantityDiffers43
Buttons typePressed buttonsPressed buttons
Customizable movement resolutionKnown for oneYes
Number of movement resolution modesKnown for one2
Frequency bandKnown for one2.4 GHz
Bluetooth versionKnown for one5.2
Buttons durability (million clicks)Known for one3000000
Design1 differ
Form factorAmbidextrousAmbidextrous
Product colourDiffersBlackBlack, Silver
MaterialKnown for oneAluminium, Plastic
LED indicatorsKnown for oneYes
Ergonomics1 differ
Cable lengthDiffers1.5 m0.8 m
Wireless rangeKnown for one10 m
Plug and PlayYesYes
Power2 differ
Power sourceDiffersCableBatteries/Cable
RechargeableKnown for oneYes
Battery life (max)Known for one40 h
Battery recharge timeKnown for one2 h
USB Type-C charging portDiffersNoYes
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedYesYes
Mac operating systems supportedYesYes
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for oneYes
Mobile operating systems supportedKnown for oneAndroid
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers109.2 mm86 mm
DepthDiffers61.1 mm93 mm
HeightDiffers35.5 mm73 mm
WeightDiffers78 g96 g
Packaging dataidentical
Quantity per pack1 pc(s)1 pc(s)
AC adapter includedKnown for oneNo
Batteryidentical
Battery capacityKnown for one230 mAh
Battery weightKnown for one8 g
Logistics dataidentical
Country of originKnown for oneChina

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mouse comparisons

All mouse comparisons