Product comparison · 2 mice

iggual OFFICE-ESSENTIAL-4D 2400DPI vs Kensington Pro Fit Ergo TB675

Add a product
  • 15specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 10identical
  • 16known for one product only

Key differences

The iggual OFFICE-ESSENTIAL-4D 2400DPI has 800 DPI more movement resolution than the Kensington Pro Fit Ergo TB675 (2400 DPI vs 1600 DPI). The Kensington Pro Fit Ergo TB675 has 5 more buttons quantity than the iggual OFFICE-ESSENTIAL-4D 2400DPI (9 vs 4). Device interface: USB Type-A on the iggual OFFICE-ESSENTIAL-4D 2400DPI, USB Type-C on the Kensington Pro Fit Ergo TB675. Scroll type: Wheel on the iggual OFFICE-ESSENTIAL-4D 2400DPI, Trackball/Wheel on the Kensington Pro Fit Ergo TB675. Form factor: Ambidextrous on the iggual OFFICE-ESSENTIAL-4D 2400DPI, Right-hand on the Kensington Pro Fit Ergo TB675.

  • Device interface
    • OFFICE-ESSENTIAL-4D 2400DPI:USB Type-A
    • Pro Fit Ergo TB675:USB Type-C
  • Movement resolution
    • OFFICE-ESSENTIAL-4D 2400DPI:2400 DPI
    • Pro Fit Ergo TB675:1600 DPI
  • Scroll type
    • OFFICE-ESSENTIAL-4D 2400DPI:Wheel
    • Pro Fit Ergo TB675:Trackball/Wheel
  • Buttons quantity
    • OFFICE-ESSENTIAL-4D 2400DPI:4
    • Pro Fit Ergo TB675:9
  • Form factor
    • OFFICE-ESSENTIAL-4D 2400DPI:Ambidextrous
    • Pro Fit Ergo TB675:Right-hand

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of OFFICE-ESSENTIAL-4D 2400DPI, Pro Fit Ergo TB675
31 specifications
Mouse4 differ
Device interfaceDiffersUSB Type-AUSB Type-C
Movement resolutionDiffers2400 DPI1600 DPI
Scroll typeDiffersWheelTrackball/Wheel
Number of scroll wheelsKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Buttons quantityDiffers49
Buttons typeKnown for onePressed buttonsUnknown — not stated by the source
Buttons durability (million clicks)Known for one3000000Unknown — not stated by the source
Programmable mouse buttonsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Number of programmable buttonsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source9
Trackball diameterKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.4 cm
Design1 differ
Form factorDiffersAmbidextrousRight-hand
Vertical designKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Ergonomicsidentical
Cable lengthKnown for one1.5 mUnknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Mobile operating systems supportedKnown for oneAndroidUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one109.2 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one61.1 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one35.5 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one78 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one1 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
AC adapter includedKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mouse comparisons

All mouse comparisons