Product comparison · 2 mice

i-tec LaserTouch NANO 242 vs Samsung MOC-350 mouse RF Wireless Optical 1200 DPI

Key differences

Movement detection technology
- LaserTouch NANO 242:Laser
- MOC-350 mouse RF Wireless Optical 1200 DPI:Optical
Movement resolution
- LaserTouch NANO 242:1600 DPI
- MOC-350 mouse RF Wireless Optical 1200 DPI:1200 DPI
Number of batteries supported
- LaserTouch NANO 242:1
- MOC-350 mouse RF Wireless Optical 1200 DPI:2
Mac operating systems supported
- LaserTouch NANO 242:No
- MOC-350 mouse RF Wireless Optical 1200 DPI:Yes

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of LaserTouch NANO 242, MOC-350
17 specifications	A i-tec LaserTouch NANO 242 View product	B Samsung MOC-350 mouse RF Wireless Optical 1200 DPI Model MOC-350 View product
Mouse2 differ
Movement detection technologyDiffers	Laser	Optical
Movement resolutionDiffers	1600 DPI	1200 DPI
Frequency bandKnown for one	2.4 GHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Wireless rangeKnown for one	10 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Number of batteries supportedDiffers	1	2
System requirements1 differ
Mac operating systems supportedDiffers	No	Yes
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WeightKnown for one	47 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other features1 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffers	Microsoft Windows ME/2000/XP 32bit/Vista 32/64bit/7 32/64bit	- Windows 98 SE/ME/2000/NT/XP/Vista - Mac OS 9.0 +
Mouse dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	76 x 54 x 27 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
CompatibilityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Win/Mac
USB requiredKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	White
Batteryidentical
Battery technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Alkaline

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.