Product comparison · 2 mice

Hama Am-7000 mouse RF Wireless Optical 800 DPI vs Trust Zanoo Bluetooth Mouse

Add a product
  • 6specifications compared
  • 3differ
  • 3identical
  • 10known for one product only

Key differences

  • Device interface
    • Am-7000 mouse RF Wireless Optical 800 DPI:RF Wireless
    • Zanoo Bluetooth Mouse:Bluetooth
  • Product colour
    • Am-7000 mouse RF Wireless Optical 800 DPI:Black
    • Zanoo Bluetooth Mouse:Grey
  • Compatible operating systems
    • Am-7000 mouse RF Wireless Optical 800 DPI:Windows 2000/XP/Vista/7
    • Zanoo Bluetooth Mouse:Win 7, Vista, XP

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of Am-7000, Zanoo Bluetooth Mouse
16 specifications
Mouse1 differ
Device interfaceDiffersRF WirelessBluetooth
Movement resolutionKnown for one800 DPIUnknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffersBlackGrey
Ergonomicsidentical
Wireless rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 m
Poweridentical
Number of batteries supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Battery typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAA
System requirementsidentical
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source195 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source238 g
Other features1 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffersWindows 2000/XP/Vista/7Win 7, Vista, XP
Minimum system requirementsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNotebook or PC with Bluetooth technology. Windows 7, Vista or XP.
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source140 x 70 x 230 mm
ContentsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBluetooth optical mouse. 1x AA battery. User’s guide.

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mouse comparisons

All mouse comparisons