Product comparison · 2 mice

Hama 00182699 mouse Office Right-hand RF Wireless Optical 1400 DPI vs Hama MW-300 mouse Office Ambidextrous RF Wireless Optical 1200 DPI

17specifications compared
9differ
8identical
18known for one product only

Key differences

Movement resolution
- 00182699 mouse Office Right-hand RF Wireless Optical 1400 DPI:1400 DPI
- MW-300 mouse Office Ambidextrous RF Wireless Optical 1200 DPI:1200 DPI
Scroll type
- 00182699 mouse Office Right-hand RF Wireless Optical 1400 DPI:Buttons
- MW-300 mouse Office Ambidextrous RF Wireless Optical 1200 DPI:Wheel
Buttons quantity
- 00182699 mouse Office Right-hand RF Wireless Optical 1400 DPI:6
- MW-300 mouse Office Ambidextrous RF Wireless Optical 1200 DPI:3
Recommended usage
- 00182699 mouse Office Right-hand RF Wireless Optical 1400 DPI:Universal
- MW-300 mouse Office Ambidextrous RF Wireless Optical 1200 DPI:PC/Laptop
Form factor
- 00182699 mouse Office Right-hand RF Wireless Optical 1400 DPI:Right-hand
- MW-300 mouse Office Ambidextrous RF Wireless Optical 1200 DPI:Ambidextrous
Product colour
- 00182699 mouse Office Right-hand RF Wireless Optical 1400 DPI:Black
- MW-300 mouse Office Ambidextrous RF Wireless Optical 1200 DPI:Anthracite
Width
- 00182699 mouse Office Right-hand RF Wireless Optical 1400 DPI:86 mm
- MW-300 mouse Office Ambidextrous RF Wireless Optical 1200 DPI:58 mm
Depth
- 00182699 mouse Office Right-hand RF Wireless Optical 1400 DPI:115 mm
- MW-300 mouse Office Ambidextrous RF Wireless Optical 1200 DPI:103 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 00182699, MW-300
35 specifications	A Hama 00182699 mouse Office Right-hand RF Wireless Optical 1400 DPI Model 00182699 View product	B Hama MW-300 mouse Office Ambidextrous RF Wireless Optical 1200 DPI Model MW-300 View product
Mouse4 differ
Movement resolutionDiffers	1400 DPI	1200 DPI
Scroll typeDiffers	Buttons	Wheel
Buttons quantityDiffers	6	3
Recommended usageDiffers	Universal	PC/Laptop
Frequency bandKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2.4 GHz
Customizable movement resolutionKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of movement resolution modesKnown for one	3	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design2 differ
Form factorDiffers	Right-hand	Ambidextrous
Product colourDiffers	Black	Anthracite
Ergonomicsidentical
Wireless rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	8 m
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power sourceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Batteries
Number of batteries supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Battery typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	AAA
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Windows 10, Windows 10 Education, Windows 10 Education x64, Windows 10 Enterprise, Windows 10 Enterprise x64, Windows 10 Home, Windows 10 Home x64, Windows 10 IOT Core, Windows 10 Pro, Windows 10 Pro x64, Windows 7, Windows 7 Enterprise, Windows 7 Enterprise x64, Windows 7 Home Basic, Windows 7 Home
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	86 mm	58 mm
DepthDiffers	115 mm	103 mm
HeightDiffers	71 mm	37 mm
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	180 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	140 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	80 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	98 g
Quantity per packKnown for one	1 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Receiver includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Wireless receiver interfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB Type-A
Receiver typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Nano receiver
Batteries includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mouse comparisons

All mouse comparisons